A Pragma-Dialectical Response to Objectivist Epistemic Challenges

Bart Garssen*, Jan Albert van Laar

*Bijbehorende auteur voor dit werk

OnderzoeksoutputAcademicpeer review

12 Citaten (Scopus)
517 Downloads (Pure)


Biro and Siegel have raised two objections against the pragma-dialectical approach to argumentation. According to the first, the pragma-dialectical theory is not genuinely normative. According to the second, the rejection of justificationism by pragma-dialecticians is unwarranted: they reject justificationism unjustly and they are not consistent in accepting some arguments ('justifications') as sound. The first objection is based on what we regard as the misconception that the goal of resolving differences of opinion cannot provide a normative perspective. In response to the second objection we argue that in pragma-dialectics, the notion of argument, and related notions, are defined in a non-justificatory manner.

Originele taal-2English
Pagina's (van-tot)122 - 141
Aantal pagina's29
TijdschriftInformal logic
Nummer van het tijdschrift2
StatusPublished - 2010

Citeer dit