A Stylometric Analysis of Seneca's disputed plays: Authorship Verification of Octavia and Hercules Oetaeus

Paschalis Agapitos*, Andreas van Cranenburgh

*Corresponding author voor dit werk

OnderzoeksoutputAcademicpeer review

10 Downloads (Pure)

Samenvatting

Seneca's authorship of Octavia and Hercules Oetaeus is disputed. This study employs established computational stylometry methods based on character n-gram frequencies to investigate this case. Based on a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of stylistic similarities within the Senecan corpus, Octavia and Phoenissae emerge as outliers, while Hercules Oetaeus only stands out when the text is split in half. Subsequently, applying PCA and Bootstrap Consensus Trees (BCT) to a corpus of distractor texts, both disputed plays align with the Senecan cluster/branch. The General Impostors method confidently reports Seneca as the author of the disputed plays under various scenarios. However, upon closer examination of text segments, indications of mixed authorship arise. Based on computational stylometry, it appears that the disputed were in large part, but not wholly, written by Seneca.
Originele taal-2English
Pagina's (van-tot)1-32
Aantal pagina's32
TijdschriftJournal of Computational Literary Studies
Volume3
Nummer van het tijdschrift1
DOI's
StatusPublished - 14-nov.-2024

Vingerafdruk

Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'A Stylometric Analysis of Seneca's disputed plays: Authorship Verification of Octavia and Hercules Oetaeus'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

Citeer dit