A terminology for in situ visualization and analysis systems

Hank Childs; Sean D. Ahern; James Ahrens; Andrew C. Bauer; Janine Bennett; E. Wes Bethel; Peer-Timo Bremer; Eric Brugger; Joseph Cottam; Matthieu Dorier; Soumya Dutta; Jean M. Favre; Thomas Fogal; Steffen Frey; Christoph Garth; Berk Geveci; William F. Godoy; Charles D. Hansen; Cyrus Harrison; Bernd Hentschel; Joseph Insley; Chris R. Johnson; Scott Klasky; Aaron Knoll; James Kress; Matthew Larsen; Jay Lofstead; Kwan-Liu Ma; Preeti Malakar; Jeremy Meredith; Kenneth Moreland; Paul Navratil; Patrick O'Leary; Manish Parashar; Valerio Pascucci; John Patchett; Tom Peterka; Steve Petruzza; Norbert Podhorszki; David Pugmire; Michel Rasquin; Silvio Rizzi; David H. Rogers; Sudhanshu Sane; Franz Sauer; Robert Sisneros; Han-Wei Shen; Will Usher; Rhonda Vickery; Venkatram Vishwanath; Ingo Wald; Ruonan Wang; Gunther H. Weber; Brad Whitlock; Matthew Wolf; Hongfeng Yu; Sean B. Ziegeler

doi:10.1177/1094342020935991

A terminology for in situ visualization and analysis systems

Hank Childs^*, Sean D. Ahern, James Ahrens, Andrew C. Bauer, Janine Bennett, E. Wes Bethel, Peer-Timo Bremer, Eric Brugger, Joseph Cottam, Matthieu Dorier, Soumya Dutta, Jean M. Favre, Thomas Fogal, Steffen Frey, Christoph Garth, Berk Geveci, William F. Godoy, Charles D. Hansen, Cyrus Harrison, Bernd HentschelJoseph Insley, Chris R. Johnson, Scott Klasky, Aaron Knoll, James Kress, Matthew Larsen, Jay Lofstead, Kwan-Liu Ma, Preeti Malakar, Jeremy Meredith, Kenneth Moreland, Paul Navratil, Patrick O'Leary, Manish Parashar, Valerio Pascucci, John Patchett, Tom Peterka, Steve Petruzza, Norbert Podhorszki, David Pugmire, Michel Rasquin, Silvio Rizzi, David H. Rogers, Sudhanshu Sane, Franz Sauer, Robert Sisneros, Han-Wei Shen, Will Usher, Rhonda Vickery, Venkatram Vishwanath, Ingo Wald, Ruonan Wang, Gunther H. Weber, Brad Whitlock, Matthew Wolf, Hongfeng Yu, Sean B. Ziegeler

^*Corresponding author voor dit werk

Onderzoeksoutput › Academic › peer review

47 Citaten (Scopus)

Samenvatting

The term "in situ processing" has evolved over the last decade to mean both a specific strategy for visualizing and analyzing data and an umbrella term for a processing paradigm. The resulting confusion makes it difficult for visualization and analysis scientists to communicate with each other and with their stakeholders. To address this problem, a group of over 50 experts convened with the goal of standardizing terminology. This paper summarizes their findings and proposes a new terminology for describing in situ systems. An important finding from this group was that in situ systems are best described via multiple, distinct axes: integration type, proximity, access, division of execution, operation controls, and output type. This paper discusses these axes, evaluates existing systems within the axes, and explores how currently used terms relate to the axes.

Originele taal-2	English
Artikelnummer	1094342020935991
Pagina's (van-tot)	676-691
Aantal pagina's	16
Tijdschrift	The International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications
Volume	34
Nummer van het tijdschrift	6
DOI's	https://doi.org/10.1177/1094342020935991
Status	Published - nov.-2020
Extern gepubliceerd	Ja

Toegang tot document

10.1177/1094342020935991

Handle.net

Permanente koppeling

Document onder embargo

A terminology for in situ visualization and analysis systems
Final publisher's version, 331 KB
Kopie aanvragen

Citeer dit

Childs, H., Ahern, S. D., Ahrens, J., Bauer, A. C., Bennett, J., Bethel, E. W., Bremer, P.-T., Brugger, E., Cottam, J., Dorier, M., Dutta, S., Favre, J. M., Fogal, T., Frey, S., Garth, C., Geveci, B., Godoy, W. F., Hansen, C. D., Harrison, C., ... Ziegeler, S. B. (2020). A terminology for in situ visualization and analysis systems. The International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications, 34(6), 676-691. Artikel 1094342020935991. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094342020935991

@article{0abb539b68c64a5aabfbb977f313d6ea,

title = "A terminology for in situ visualization and analysis systems",

abstract = "The term {"}in situ processing{"} has evolved over the last decade to mean both a specific strategy for visualizing and analyzing data and an umbrella term for a processing paradigm. The resulting confusion makes it difficult for visualization and analysis scientists to communicate with each other and with their stakeholders. To address this problem, a group of over 50 experts convened with the goal of standardizing terminology. This paper summarizes their findings and proposes a new terminology for describing in situ systems. An important finding from this group was that in situ systems are best described via multiple, distinct axes: integration type, proximity, access, division of execution, operation controls, and output type. This paper discusses these axes, evaluates existing systems within the axes, and explores how currently used terms relate to the axes.",

keywords = "In situ processing, scientific visualization, FRAMEWORK, I/O",

author = "Hank Childs and Ahern, {Sean D.} and James Ahrens and Bauer, {Andrew C.} and Janine Bennett and Bethel, {E. Wes} and Peer-Timo Bremer and Eric Brugger and Joseph Cottam and Matthieu Dorier and Soumya Dutta and Favre, {Jean M.} and Thomas Fogal and Steffen Frey and Christoph Garth and Berk Geveci and Godoy, {William F.} and Hansen, {Charles D.} and Cyrus Harrison and Bernd Hentschel and Joseph Insley and Johnson, {Chris R.} and Scott Klasky and Aaron Knoll and James Kress and Matthew Larsen and Jay Lofstead and Kwan-Liu Ma and Preeti Malakar and Jeremy Meredith and Kenneth Moreland and Paul Navratil and Patrick O'Leary and Manish Parashar and Valerio Pascucci and John Patchett and Tom Peterka and Steve Petruzza and Norbert Podhorszki and David Pugmire and Michel Rasquin and Silvio Rizzi and Rogers, {David H.} and Sudhanshu Sane and Franz Sauer and Robert Sisneros and Han-Wei Shen and Will Usher and Rhonda Vickery and Venkatram Vishwanath and Ingo Wald and Ruonan Wang and Weber, {Gunther H.} and Brad Whitlock and Matthew Wolf and Hongfeng Yu and Ziegeler, {Sean B.}",

year = "2020",

month = nov,

doi = "10.1177/1094342020935991",

language = "English",

volume = "34",

pages = "676--691",

journal = "The International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications",

issn = "1094-3420",

publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

number = "6",

}

Childs, H, Ahern, SD, Ahrens, J, Bauer, AC, Bennett, J, Bethel, EW, Bremer, P-T, Brugger, E, Cottam, J, Dorier, M, Dutta, S, Favre, JM, Fogal, T, Frey, S, Garth, C, Geveci, B, Godoy, WF, Hansen, CD, Harrison, C, Hentschel, B, Insley, J, Johnson, CR, Klasky, S, Knoll, A, Kress, J, Larsen, M, Lofstead, J, Ma, K-L, Malakar, P, Meredith, J, Moreland, K, Navratil, P, O'Leary, P, Parashar, M, Pascucci, V, Patchett, J, Peterka, T, Petruzza, S, Podhorszki, N, Pugmire, D, Rasquin, M, Rizzi, S, Rogers, DH, Sane, S, Sauer, F, Sisneros, R, Shen, H-W, Usher, W, Vickery, R, Vishwanath, V, Wald, I, Wang, R, Weber, GH, Whitlock, B, Wolf, M, Yu, H & Ziegeler, SB 2020, 'A terminology for in situ visualization and analysis systems', The International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications, vol. 34, nr. 6, 1094342020935991, blz. 676-691. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094342020935991

TY - JOUR

T1 - A terminology for in situ visualization and analysis systems

AU - Childs, Hank

AU - Ahern, Sean D.

AU - Ahrens, James

AU - Bauer, Andrew C.

AU - Bennett, Janine

AU - Bethel, E. Wes

AU - Bremer, Peer-Timo

AU - Brugger, Eric

AU - Cottam, Joseph

AU - Dorier, Matthieu

AU - Dutta, Soumya

AU - Favre, Jean M.

AU - Fogal, Thomas

AU - Frey, Steffen

AU - Garth, Christoph

AU - Geveci, Berk

AU - Godoy, William F.

AU - Hansen, Charles D.

AU - Harrison, Cyrus

AU - Hentschel, Bernd

AU - Insley, Joseph

AU - Johnson, Chris R.

AU - Klasky, Scott

AU - Knoll, Aaron

AU - Kress, James

AU - Larsen, Matthew

AU - Lofstead, Jay

AU - Ma, Kwan-Liu

AU - Malakar, Preeti

AU - Meredith, Jeremy

AU - Moreland, Kenneth

AU - Navratil, Paul

AU - O'Leary, Patrick

AU - Parashar, Manish

AU - Pascucci, Valerio

AU - Patchett, John

AU - Peterka, Tom

AU - Petruzza, Steve

AU - Podhorszki, Norbert

AU - Pugmire, David

AU - Rasquin, Michel

AU - Rizzi, Silvio

AU - Rogers, David H.

AU - Sane, Sudhanshu

AU - Sauer, Franz

AU - Sisneros, Robert

AU - Shen, Han-Wei

AU - Usher, Will

AU - Vickery, Rhonda

AU - Vishwanath, Venkatram

AU - Wald, Ingo

AU - Wang, Ruonan

AU - Weber, Gunther H.

AU - Whitlock, Brad

AU - Wolf, Matthew

AU - Yu, Hongfeng

AU - Ziegeler, Sean B.

PY - 2020/11

Y1 - 2020/11

N2 - The term "in situ processing" has evolved over the last decade to mean both a specific strategy for visualizing and analyzing data and an umbrella term for a processing paradigm. The resulting confusion makes it difficult for visualization and analysis scientists to communicate with each other and with their stakeholders. To address this problem, a group of over 50 experts convened with the goal of standardizing terminology. This paper summarizes their findings and proposes a new terminology for describing in situ systems. An important finding from this group was that in situ systems are best described via multiple, distinct axes: integration type, proximity, access, division of execution, operation controls, and output type. This paper discusses these axes, evaluates existing systems within the axes, and explores how currently used terms relate to the axes.

AB - The term "in situ processing" has evolved over the last decade to mean both a specific strategy for visualizing and analyzing data and an umbrella term for a processing paradigm. The resulting confusion makes it difficult for visualization and analysis scientists to communicate with each other and with their stakeholders. To address this problem, a group of over 50 experts convened with the goal of standardizing terminology. This paper summarizes their findings and proposes a new terminology for describing in situ systems. An important finding from this group was that in situ systems are best described via multiple, distinct axes: integration type, proximity, access, division of execution, operation controls, and output type. This paper discusses these axes, evaluates existing systems within the axes, and explores how currently used terms relate to the axes.

KW - In situ processing

KW - scientific visualization

KW - FRAMEWORK

KW - I/O

U2 - 10.1177/1094342020935991

DO - 10.1177/1094342020935991

M3 - Article

SN - 1094-3420

VL - 34

SP - 676

EP - 691

JO - The International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications

JF - The International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications

IS - 6

M1 - 1094342020935991

ER -

A terminology for in situ visualization and analysis systems

Samenvatting

Toegang tot document

Handle.net

Document onder embargo

Vingerafdruk

Citeer dit