Abu Ghraib and the War on Terror-a case against Donald Rumsfeld?

Alette Smeulers*, Sander van Niekerk

*Bijbehorende auteur voor dit werk

OnderzoeksoutputAcademicpeer review

14 Citaten (Scopus)

Samenvatting

The pictures of the inhuman and abusive treatment of Iraqi prisoners at the Abu Ghraib prison shocked the world. The authors of this contribution will take a criminological approach to the crimes committed and will show-by using an analytical framework used by organizational criminologists-that the abuse and torture at Abu Ghraib was an inevitable outcome of the War on Terror as launched by the U.S. administration in a reaction to the terrorist attack launched against it. The abuse at Abu Ghraib which violated U.S. as well as international human rights law was not caused by a few rotten apples as policymakers tried to make us believe, but was a clear example of a state crime. A state crime for which U.S. leaders within the Bush administration such as the Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, might be held criminally responsible if they would be prosecuted by the ICC.

Originele taal-2English
Pagina's (van-tot)327-349
Aantal pagina's23
TijdschriftCrime, Law and Social Change
Volume51
Nummer van het tijdschrift3-4
DOI's
StatusPublished - apr-2009
Extern gepubliceerdJa

Citeer dit