Academic superstars: competent or lucky?

OnderzoeksoutputAcademicpeer review

7 Citaten (Scopus)
19 Downloads (Pure)


I show that the social stratification of academic science can arise as a result of academics' preference for reading work of high epistemic value. This is consistent with a view on which academic superstars are highly competent academics, but also with a view on which superstars arise primarily due to luck. I argue that stratification is beneficial if most superstars are competent, but not if most superstars are lucky. I also argue that it is impossible to tell whether most superstars are in fact competent or lucky, or which group a given superstar belongs to, and hence whether stratification is overall beneficial.

Originele taal-2English
Pagina's (van-tot)4499-4518
Aantal pagina's20
Nummer van het tijdschrift11
Vroegere onlinedatum24-sep-2016
StatusPublished - nov-2017
Extern gepubliceerdJa

Citeer dit