Advancing collaboration in health professions education in the general practice domain, developing a national research agenda

Esther de Groot*, Marianne Mak-van der Vossen, Irene Slootweg, Meryem Çorum, Anneke Kramer, Jean Muris, Nynke Scherpbier, Bart Thoonen, Roger Damoiseaux

*Corresponding author voor dit werk

OnderzoeksoutputAcademicpeer review

55 Downloads (Pure)

Samenvatting

BACKGROUND: Health professions education (HPE) research in the General Practice domain (GP-HPE) is vital for high-quality healthcare. Collaboration among GP-HPE researchers is crucial but challenging. Formulating a research agenda, involving stakeholders, and fostering inter-institutional collaboration can address these challenges and connect educational research and practice.

METHODS: We used Q-methodology to explore perspectives on GP-HPE research of participants from all Dutch postgraduate GP training institutes. Participants individually sorted statements based on the relevance of future GP-HPE research for educational practice. Data analysis comprised inverted factor analysis, rotation, and qualitative interpretation of configurations of all statements. The National Meeting on Educational Research took a participatory approach.

RESULTS: We included 73 participants with diverse involvement in GP-HPE research. We identified five distinct perspectives, each representing a research focus area for developing and innovating GP education: the clinician scientist, the socially engaged GP, the specific GP identity, the GP as an entrepreneur, and the GP engaged in lifelong learning.

DISCUSSION: The resulting five perspectives align with General Practice hallmarks. Q-methodology and a participatory approach facilitated collaboration among stakeholders. Successful inter-institutional collaboration requires a common goal, neutral leadership, participant commitment, regular meetings, audit trail support, process transparency, and reflexivity. Future research should address evidence gaps within these perspectives.

CONCLUSION: Using Q-methodology turned out to be valuable for compiling a national research agenda for GP-HPE research. The research process helped to cross boundaries between researchers in different institutions, thus putting inter-institutional collaborative advantage center stage. Our approach could provide a conceivable procedure for HPE researchers worldwide.

Originele taal-2English
Pagina's (van-tot)1417–1434
Aantal pagina's18
TijdschriftAdvances in Health Sciences Education Theory and Practice
Volume29
Vroegere onlinedatum27-mei-2024
DOI's
StatusPublished - sep.-2024

Vingerafdruk

Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'Advancing collaboration in health professions education in the general practice domain, developing a national research agenda'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

Citeer dit