An argument against the syntactic nature of verb movement


    66 Downloads (Pure)


    Recent research into the nature of periphrasis converges on the view that periphrastic forms occupy cells in morphological paradigms. This paper argues that the relative past (“perfect”) in Dutch should be understood as periphrastic in this sense. Adopting the current minimalist view on the relation between morphology and syntax, in which inflectional morphemes are not generated in syntax but realized postsyntactically in a morphological component, the analysis leads to the conclusion that the relative past’s auxiliary is not an element of narrow syntax either. The paper argues that this approach simplifies the syntactic analysis of Dutch verb clusters. The upshot of the analysis is that since auxiliaries undergo verb-second, verb movement must be a postsyntactic operation, as suggested by Chomsky (2001).
    Originele taal-2English
    TitelOrder and structure in syntax 1
    SubtitelWord order and syntactic structure
    Plaats van productieBerlin
    UitgeverijLanguage Science Press
    Aantal pagina's19
    ISBN van elektronische versie978-3-96110-026-2
    ISBN van geprinte versie978-3-96110-027-9
    StatusPublished - 21-dec-2017

    Publicatie series

    NaamOpen Generative Syntax
    UitgeverijLanguage Science Press

    Citeer dit