TY - JOUR
T1 - An in vitro Study to determine the antibacterial activity of chlorhexidine and herbal mouthrinses against Enterococcus faecalis
AU - Nagappan, N.
AU - Ejaj, M. Mohamed
AU - D'Cruz, Thomson Mariadasan
AU - Subbiah, Gireesh Kumar
AU - Rameezuddin, Tajuddin
AU - Subbiah, Krithika
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/7
Y1 - 2022/7
N2 - Background: Oral diseases have a strong history of treating by natural remedies. Chemical plaque reduction techniques, including dental mouthwashes, are intriguing because they can help patients who are unable to maintain appropriate mechanical plaque management. They are a less technically difficult alternative to mechanical control. Aim: This study aimed to compare the antibacterial efficacy of an herbal and 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthrinse against Enterococcus faecalis. Methodology: The antimicrobial effectiveness (zone of inhibition) of an herbal mouthrinse and chlorhexidine mouthrinse was determined by agar well diffusion method. Results: The zone of inhibition for control mouthrinse was 19 mm, and there was no zone of inhibition observed for the experimental mouthrinse. Conclusion: The result of this investigation suggests 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate has a better antimicrobial activity than herbal mouthrinse.
AB - Background: Oral diseases have a strong history of treating by natural remedies. Chemical plaque reduction techniques, including dental mouthwashes, are intriguing because they can help patients who are unable to maintain appropriate mechanical plaque management. They are a less technically difficult alternative to mechanical control. Aim: This study aimed to compare the antibacterial efficacy of an herbal and 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthrinse against Enterococcus faecalis. Methodology: The antimicrobial effectiveness (zone of inhibition) of an herbal mouthrinse and chlorhexidine mouthrinse was determined by agar well diffusion method. Results: The zone of inhibition for control mouthrinse was 19 mm, and there was no zone of inhibition observed for the experimental mouthrinse. Conclusion: The result of this investigation suggests 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate has a better antimicrobial activity than herbal mouthrinse.
KW - Antimicrobial efficacy
KW - chlorhexidine
KW - Enterococcus faecalis
KW - herbal
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85135131683&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_819_21
DO - 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_819_21
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85135131683
SN - 0975-7406
VL - 14
SP - S995-S999
JO - Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
JF - Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
IS - 5
ER -