An upper gastrointestinal ulcer still bleeding after endoscopy: what comes next?

E. M. E. Craenen, Hendrik Hofker, Frans Peters, G. M. Kater, K. R. Glatman, J. G. Zijlstra*

*Bijbehorende auteur voor dit werk

Onderzoeksoutputpeer review

2 Citaten (Scopus)

Samenvatting

Introduction: Recurrent bleeding from an upper gastrointestinal ulcer when endoscopy fails is a reason for radiological or surgical treatment, both of which have their advantages and disadvantages.

Case: Based on a patient with recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding, we reviewed the available evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of surgical treatment and embolisation, respectively.

Discussion: Transarterial embolisation (TAE) and surgical treatment are both options for recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding when endoscopy fails. Both therapies have serious complications and a risk of rebleeding. Choosing the therapy depends on the capability of the patient to tolerate haemodynamic instability, resuscitation and hypotension.

Conclusion: Choosing between TAE and surgery depends a great deal on the case presented, haemodynamic stability and the skills and tools available at that moment.

Originele taal-2English
Pagina's (van-tot)355-358
Aantal pagina's4
TijdschriftThe Netherlands Journal of Medicine
Volume71
Nummer van het tijdschrift7
StatusPublished - sep-2013

Citeer dit