TY - JOUR
T1 - Antibiotic treatment of moderate-severe community-acquired pneumonia
T2 - design and rationale of a multicentre cluster-randomised cross-over trial
AU - van Werkhoven, C H
AU - Postma, D F
AU - Oosterheert, J J
AU - Bonten, M J M
PY - 2014/4
Y1 - 2014/4
N2 - BACKGROUND: For the empirical treatment of community-acquired pneumonia requiring admission to a non-ICU ward, the Dutch guidelines recommend either beta-lactam monotherapy, beta-lactam and macrolide combination therapy, or fluoroquinolone monotherapy. The lack of convincing evidence to preferentially recommend any of the three empiric regimens results from intrinsic limitations of current studies, such as bias by indication and residual confounding in observational studies, and the unknown effects of pre-randomisation antibiotic use in randomised controlled trials. In this paper we discuss the methodological drawbacks of observational cohorts and randomised controlled trials in antibiotic therapy. Next, we explain why we designed a multicentre cluster-randomised cross-over study to evaluate the effectiveness of three antibiotic treatment strategies, consisting of a preferred treatment regimen of beta-lactam monotherapy, beta-lactam and macrolide combination therapy or fluoroquinolone monotherapy, in adult patients admitted to a non-ICU ward with a clinical diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia. Furthermore we outline different aspects of this design that deserve thorough consideration.CONCLUSION: We discuss different aspects of a cluster-randomised cross-over trial that is designed to determine the effects of three recommended regimens of antibiotic treatment of CAP.
AB - BACKGROUND: For the empirical treatment of community-acquired pneumonia requiring admission to a non-ICU ward, the Dutch guidelines recommend either beta-lactam monotherapy, beta-lactam and macrolide combination therapy, or fluoroquinolone monotherapy. The lack of convincing evidence to preferentially recommend any of the three empiric regimens results from intrinsic limitations of current studies, such as bias by indication and residual confounding in observational studies, and the unknown effects of pre-randomisation antibiotic use in randomised controlled trials. In this paper we discuss the methodological drawbacks of observational cohorts and randomised controlled trials in antibiotic therapy. Next, we explain why we designed a multicentre cluster-randomised cross-over study to evaluate the effectiveness of three antibiotic treatment strategies, consisting of a preferred treatment regimen of beta-lactam monotherapy, beta-lactam and macrolide combination therapy or fluoroquinolone monotherapy, in adult patients admitted to a non-ICU ward with a clinical diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia. Furthermore we outline different aspects of this design that deserve thorough consideration.CONCLUSION: We discuss different aspects of a cluster-randomised cross-over trial that is designed to determine the effects of three recommended regimens of antibiotic treatment of CAP.
KW - Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use
KW - Community-Acquired Infections/drug therapy
KW - Cross-Over Studies
KW - Drug Therapy, Combination
KW - Fluoroquinolones/therapeutic use
KW - Humans
KW - Macrolides/therapeutic use
KW - Observational Studies as Topic
KW - Pneumonia, Bacterial/drug therapy
KW - Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
KW - Research Design
KW - Severity of Illness Index
KW - beta-Lactams/therapeutic use
M3 - Article
C2 - 24846935
SN - 0300-2977
VL - 72
SP - 170
EP - 178
JO - The Netherlands Journal of Medicine
JF - The Netherlands Journal of Medicine
IS - 3
ER -