TY - JOUR
T1 - Appeals to Authority in Political Rhetoric
T2 - Machiavelli in the Italian Parliament 1945-1994
AU - Casiraghi, Matteo Cesare Mario
AU - Testini, Francesco
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Hansard Society; all rights reserved.
PY - 2021/4/1
Y1 - 2021/4/1
N2 - Scholarship in rhetorical political analysis and parliamentary studies devoted little attention to study how politicians employ intellectuals' authority and theories in their discourses. We offer methodological directions to navigate this territory, combining quantitative and qualitative analyses to investigate the employment of Machiavelli's figure in the Italian Parliament. We show that Machiavelli is regarded as a contested authority and that appeals to his arguments can perform different rhetorical functions, which are countered with different rhetorical tactics. In particular, we show that the right appropriates the realist Machiavelli, especially in foreign policy, both as a national symbol and as a legitimate source of insights on political affairs, while the left and the centre resist these claims with alternative rhetorical tactics. Finally, we provide an original dataset and a new theoretical framework for future explorations of intellectuals and other authoritative figures' rhetorical influence on politics.
AB - Scholarship in rhetorical political analysis and parliamentary studies devoted little attention to study how politicians employ intellectuals' authority and theories in their discourses. We offer methodological directions to navigate this territory, combining quantitative and qualitative analyses to investigate the employment of Machiavelli's figure in the Italian Parliament. We show that Machiavelli is regarded as a contested authority and that appeals to his arguments can perform different rhetorical functions, which are countered with different rhetorical tactics. In particular, we show that the right appropriates the realist Machiavelli, especially in foreign policy, both as a national symbol and as a legitimate source of insights on political affairs, while the left and the centre resist these claims with alternative rhetorical tactics. Finally, we provide an original dataset and a new theoretical framework for future explorations of intellectuals and other authoritative figures' rhetorical influence on politics.
KW - Intellectuals
KW - Italian Politics
KW - Machiavelli
KW - Parliamentary Debates
KW - Parliamentary Studies
KW - Rhetorical Political Analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85111674296&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/pa/gsaa005
DO - 10.1093/pa/gsaa005
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85111674296
SN - 0031-2290
VL - 74
SP - 333
EP - 353
JO - Parliamentary Affairs
JF - Parliamentary Affairs
IS - 2
ER -