Argumentation schemes from Hamblin's dialectical perspective

OnderzoeksoutputAcademicpeer review

5 Citaten (Scopus)
156 Downloads (Pure)

Samenvatting

This paper aims at a normative account of non-deductive argumentation schemes in the spirit of Hamblin's dialectical philosophy. First, three principles are presented that characterize Hamblin's dialectical stance. Second, argumentation schemes, which have hardly been examined in Hamblin's book Fallacies, shall be dealt with by applying these principles, taking an argumentation scheme from authority as the leading example. Third, a formal dialectical system, along the lines indicated by Hamblin, shall be developed that includes norms for using argumentation schemes and norms for responding to arguments that are presented as instantiating acceptable argumentation schemes.

Originele taal-2English
Pagina's (van-tot)344-366
Aantal pagina's23
TijdschriftInformal logic
Volume31
Nummer van het tijdschrift4
StatusPublished - 2011

Citeer dit