Assessing the effect of a guideline change on drug use prevalence by including the birth cohort dimension: the case of benzodiazepines

Maarten J. Bijlsma*, Eelko Hak, Jens Bos, Lolkje T. W. De Jong-van den Berg, Fanny Janssen

*Bijbehorende auteur voor dit werk

OnderzoeksoutputAcademicpeer review

5 Citaten (Scopus)

Samenvatting

Purpose The aim of this study was to investigate whether including the birth cohort dimension in time series analysis leads to a more accurate estimation of the (long-term) effect of a guideline change on the trend of benzodiazepine use.

Methods We calculated age-specific (20-84years) and sex-specific prevalence of benzodiazepine use per 1000 population per quarter year (1998 to 2008) using a prescription database set in the Netherlands. We studied the prevalence over time by age group and within birth cohorts through interrupted time series analyses to estimate the effect of the guideline change in 2001.

Results From 1998 to 2008, the overall age-standardized prevalence of benzodiazepine use per 1000 population declined from similar to 54 for men and similar to 107 for women to similar to 45 for men and similar to 85 for women. The relative change increased significantly after 2001 for both sexes and for the majority of age groups. Within birth cohorts, the prevalence increased with age until the year 2001 and leveled thereafter. The age-period approach overall had worse model fit indicators than the within-cohort approach and predicted larger long-term effects than the within-cohort approach. The age-period projection estimated 36% decline in benzodiazepine use relative to 2008, whereas the birth-cohort projection estimated 8% decline.

Conclusion Explicitly following birth cohort trajectories led to models with better fit; the conventional approach estimated a stronger long-term guideline effect. This has important implications for professional practice. Copyright (c) 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Originele taal-2English
Pagina's (van-tot)933-941
Aantal pagina's9
TijdschriftPharmacoepidemiology & Drug Safety
Volume22
Nummer van het tijdschrift9
DOI's
StatusPublished - sep-2013

Citeer dit