TY - JOUR
T1 - Attraction versus production in restoration
T2 - Spatial and habitat effects of shellfish reefs for fish in coastal seascapes
AU - Gilby, Ben L.
AU - Olds, Andrew D.
AU - Chapman, Susie
AU - Goodridge Gaines, Lucy A.
AU - Henderson, Christopher J.
AU - Ortodossi, Nicholas L.
AU - Didderen, Karin
AU - Lengkeek, Wouter
AU - van der Heide, Tjisse
AU - Schlacher, Thomas A.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank Healthy Land and Water for funding for this project and thank the dozens of student volunteers who assisted in both field work and video analysis. The authors pay particular thanks to the broader Pumicestone Passage Shellfish Reef Restoration team, including University of the Sunshine Coast, Moreton Bay Regional Council, Unity Water, OzFish Unlimited, Sunfish Queensland Inc., Digsfish Services, Joondoburri Land Trust, Kabi Kabi First Nation, Pumicestone Passage Fish Restocking Association, Sebastiani Oyster Farm, BCF, the Queensland State Government, and the Australian Government National Landcare Program.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Society for Ecological Restoration.
PY - 2021/9
Y1 - 2021/9
N2 - Restored shellfish reefs provide valuable habitat for fish, but it is not clear how different approaches affect performance, and either promote the development of new fish populations (i.e. “production”) or simply attract individuals from the broader seascape (i.e. “attraction”). We measured the effects of a 1.5 ha shellfish reef restoration site on fish assemblages in Pumicestone Passage in eastern Australia, which contains replicates of six different restoration units: shell patch reefs, crates of shells, and biodegradable matrix, and each had replicates with and without live oysters. Fish were surveyed before restoration and then every 6 months for 30 months with baited (at restoration and control sites) and unbaited (at 106 sites across the seascape to detect potential fish attraction, and at the different restoration units) underwater cameras. Shellfish reef restoration represents an addition to the carrying capacity of Pumicestone Passage for fish for two key reasons. First, restoration significantly enhanced the diversity and abundance of fish assemblages and the density of harvestable fish at the restoration site by 3.8, 10.7, and 16.4 times, respectively. Second, fish distributions across the broader seascape did not change in response to succession at the restoration site. Fish assemblages did not differ between restoration units or the presence or absence of oysters. These findings further support the notion that restored shellfish reefs significantly enhance fish abundance and diversity and that restored reefs can enhance the overall carrying capacity of seascapes for fish, rather than simply centralizing them at restoration sites.
AB - Restored shellfish reefs provide valuable habitat for fish, but it is not clear how different approaches affect performance, and either promote the development of new fish populations (i.e. “production”) or simply attract individuals from the broader seascape (i.e. “attraction”). We measured the effects of a 1.5 ha shellfish reef restoration site on fish assemblages in Pumicestone Passage in eastern Australia, which contains replicates of six different restoration units: shell patch reefs, crates of shells, and biodegradable matrix, and each had replicates with and without live oysters. Fish were surveyed before restoration and then every 6 months for 30 months with baited (at restoration and control sites) and unbaited (at 106 sites across the seascape to detect potential fish attraction, and at the different restoration units) underwater cameras. Shellfish reef restoration represents an addition to the carrying capacity of Pumicestone Passage for fish for two key reasons. First, restoration significantly enhanced the diversity and abundance of fish assemblages and the density of harvestable fish at the restoration site by 3.8, 10.7, and 16.4 times, respectively. Second, fish distributions across the broader seascape did not change in response to succession at the restoration site. Fish assemblages did not differ between restoration units or the presence or absence of oysters. These findings further support the notion that restored shellfish reefs significantly enhance fish abundance and diversity and that restored reefs can enhance the overall carrying capacity of seascapes for fish, rather than simply centralizing them at restoration sites.
KW - Australia
KW - fisheries
KW - oyster
KW - Pumicestone Passage
KW - seascape
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85108287508
U2 - 10.1111/rec.13413
DO - 10.1111/rec.13413
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85108287508
SN - 1061-2971
VL - 29
JO - Restoration Ecology
JF - Restoration Ecology
IS - 7
M1 - e13413
ER -