TY - JOUR
T1 - Automatic identification of tinnitus malingering based on overt and covert behavioral responses during psychoacoustic testing
AU - Smalt, Christopher J.
AU - Sugai, Jenna A.
AU - Koops, Elouise A.
AU - Jahn, Kelly N.
AU - Hancock, Kenneth E.
AU - Polley, Daniel B.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank Michael Brandstein for his review of the classifier design and implementation. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release. Distribution is unlimited. This work was supported by a research award from the Boston One Fund and NIDCD P50 DC015817. This material is based upon work supported by the United States Air Force under Air Force Contract No. FA8702-15-D-0001. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Air Force.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - Tinnitus, or ringing in the ears, is a prevalent condition that imposes a substantial health and financial burden on the patient and to society. The diagnosis of tinnitus, like pain, relies on patient self-report, which can complicate the distinction between actual and fraudulent claims. Here, we combined tablet-based self-directed hearing assessments with neural network classifiers to automatically differentiate participants with tinnitus (N = 24) from a malingering cohort, who were instructed to feign an imagined tinnitus percept (N = 28). We identified clear differences between the groups, both in their overt reporting of tinnitus features, but also covert differences in their fingertip movement trajectories on the tablet surface as they performed the reporting assay. Using only 10 min of data, we achieved 81% accuracy classifying patients and malingerers (ROC AUC = 0.88) with leave-one-out cross validation. Quantitative, automated measurements of tinnitus salience could improve clinical outcome assays and more accurately determine tinnitus incidence.
AB - Tinnitus, or ringing in the ears, is a prevalent condition that imposes a substantial health and financial burden on the patient and to society. The diagnosis of tinnitus, like pain, relies on patient self-report, which can complicate the distinction between actual and fraudulent claims. Here, we combined tablet-based self-directed hearing assessments with neural network classifiers to automatically differentiate participants with tinnitus (N = 24) from a malingering cohort, who were instructed to feign an imagined tinnitus percept (N = 28). We identified clear differences between the groups, both in their overt reporting of tinnitus features, but also covert differences in their fingertip movement trajectories on the tablet surface as they performed the reporting assay. Using only 10 min of data, we achieved 81% accuracy classifying patients and malingerers (ROC AUC = 0.88) with leave-one-out cross validation. Quantitative, automated measurements of tinnitus salience could improve clinical outcome assays and more accurately determine tinnitus incidence.
U2 - 10.1038/s41746-022-00675-w
DO - 10.1038/s41746-022-00675-w
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85137145554
SN - 2398-6352
VL - 5
JO - Npj digital medicine
JF - Npj digital medicine
M1 - 127
ER -