Baseline health status and setting impacted Minimal Clinically Important Differences in COPD: an explorative study

Harma Alma, Corina de Jong, Danijel Jelusic, Michael Wittmann, Michael Schuler, B.J. Kollen, Robbert Sanderman, Janwillem Kocks, Konrad Schultz, Thys van der Molen

OnderzoeksoutputAcademicpeer review

10 Citaten (Scopus)
133 Downloads (Pure)


OBJECTIVE: Minimal Clinically Important Differences (MCIDs) are used as fixed numbers in the interpretation of clinical trials. Little is known about its dynamics. This study aims to explore the impact of baseline score, study setting and patient characteristics on health status MCIDs in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Baseline and follow-up data on the COPD Assessment Test (CAT), Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) were retrospectively analysed from Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR) and Routine Clinical Practice (RCP). Anchor- and distribution-based MCID estimates were calculated, and tested between settings, gender, age, GOLD classification, co-morbidities and baseline health status.

RESULTS: In total, 658 patients were included with 2299 change measurements. MCID estimates for improvement and deterioration ranged for all subgroups 0.50-6.30 (CAT); 0.10-0.84 (CCQ); 0.33-12.86 (SGRQ). Larger MCID estimates for improvement and smaller ones for deterioration were noted in patients with worse baseline health status, females, elderly, GOLD I/II patients, and patients with less co-morbidities. Estimates from PR were larger.

CONCLUSION: Baseline health status and setting affected MCID estimates of COPD health status questionnaires. Patterns were observed for gender, age, spirometry classification and co-morbidity levels. These outcomes would advocate the need for tailored MCIDs.

Originele taal-2English
Pagina's (van-tot)49-61
Aantal pagina's13
TijdschriftJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Vroegere onlinedatum27-jul.-2019
StatusPublished - dec.-2019

Citeer dit