Bias Correction Methods Explain Much of the Variation Seen in Breast Cancer Risks of BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers

Janet R. Vos*, Li Hsu, Richard M. Brohet, Marian J. E. Mourits, Jakob de Vries, Kathleen E. Malone, Jan C. Oosterwijk, Geertruida H. de Bock

*Bijbehorende auteur voor dit werk

Onderzoeksoutputpeer review

23 Citaten (Scopus)



Recommendations for treating patients who carry a BRCA1/2 gene are mainly based on cumulative lifetime risks (CLTRs) of breast cancer determined from retrospective cohorts. These risks vary widely (27% to 88%), and it is important to understand why. We analyzed the effects of methods of risk estimation and bias correction and of population factors on CLTRs in this retrospective clinical cohort of BRCA1/2 carriers.

Patients and Methods

The following methods to estimate the breast cancer risk of BRCA1/2 carriers were identified from the literature: Kaplan-Meier, frailty, and modified segregation analyses with bias correction consisting of including or excluding index patients combined with including or excluding first-degree relatives (FDRs) or different conditional likelihoods. These were applied to clinical data of BRCA1/2 families derived from our family cancer clinic for whom a simulation was also performed to evaluate the methods. CLTRs and 95% CIs were estimated and compared with the reference CLTRs.


CLTRs ranged from 35% to 83% for BRCA1 and 41% to 86% for BRCA2 carriers at age 70 years width of 95% CIs: 10% to 35% and 13% to 46%, respectively). Relative bias varied from -38% to +16%. Bias correction with inclusion of index patients and untested FDRs gave the smallest bias: +2% (SD, 2%) in BRCA1 and +0.9% (SD, 3.6%) in BRCA2.


Much of the variation in breast cancer CLTRs in retrospective clinical BRCA1/2 cohorts is due to the bias-correction method, whereas a smaller part is due to population differences. Kaplan-Meier analyses with bias correction that includes index patients and a proportion of untested FDRs provide suitable CLTRs for carriers counseled in the clinic. (C) 2015 by American Society of Clinical Oncology

Originele taal-2English
Pagina's (van-tot)2553-2562
Aantal pagina's10
TijdschriftJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
Nummer van het tijdschrift23
StatusPublished - 10-aug.-2015


Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'Bias Correction Methods Explain Much of the Variation Seen in Breast Cancer Risks of BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

Citeer dit