TY - JOUR
T1 - Cervical pessaries for prevention of preterm birth in women with a multiple pregnancy (ProTWIN)
T2 - A multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial
AU - Liem, Sophie
AU - Schuit, Ewoud
AU - Hegeman, Maud
AU - Bais, Joke
AU - de Boer, Karin
AU - Bloemenkamp, Kitty
AU - Brons, Jozien
AU - Duvekot, Hans
AU - Bijvank, Bas Nij
AU - Franssen, Maureen
AU - Gaugler, Ingrid
AU - de Graaf, Irene
AU - Oudijk, Martijn
AU - Papatsonis, Dimitri
AU - Pernet, Paula
AU - Porath, Martina
AU - Scheepers, Liesbeth
AU - Sikkema, Marko
AU - Sporken, Jan
AU - Visser, Harry
AU - van Wijngaarden, Wim
AU - Woiski, Mallory
AU - van Pampus, Marille
AU - Mol, Ben Willem
AU - Bekedam, Dick
PY - 2013/10
Y1 - 2013/10
N2 - Background In women with a multiple pregnancy, spontaneous preterm delivery is the leading cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality. Interventions to reduce preterm birth in these women have not been successful. We assessed whether a cervical pessary could effectively prevent poor perinatal outcomes.Methods We undertook a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial in 40 hospitals in the Netherlands. We randomly assigned women with a multiple pregnancy between 12 and 20 weeks' gestation (1: 1) to pessary or control groups, using a web-based application with a computer-generated list with random block sizes of two to four, stratified by hospital. Participants and investigators were aware of group allocation. For women in the pessary group, a midwife or obstetrician inserted a cervical pessary between 16 and 20 weeks' gestation. Women in the control group did not receive the pessary, but otherwise received similar obstetrical care to those in the pessary group. The primary outcome was a composite of poor perinatal outcome: stillbirth, periventricular leucomalacia, severe respiratory distress syndrome, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, intraventricular haemorrhage, necrotising enterocolitis, proven sepsis, and neonatal death. Analyses were by modified intention to treat. This trial is registered in the Dutch trial registry, number NTR1858.Findings Between Sept 21, 2009, and March 9, 2012, 813 women underwent randomisation, of whom 808 were analysed (401 in the pessary group; 407 in the control group). At least one child of 53 women (13%) in the pessary group had poor perinatal outcome, compared with 55 (14%) in the control group (relative risk 0.98, 95% CI 0.69-1.39).Interpretation In unselected women with a multiple pregnancy, prophylactic use of a cervical pessary does not reduce poor perinatal outcome.
AB - Background In women with a multiple pregnancy, spontaneous preterm delivery is the leading cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality. Interventions to reduce preterm birth in these women have not been successful. We assessed whether a cervical pessary could effectively prevent poor perinatal outcomes.Methods We undertook a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial in 40 hospitals in the Netherlands. We randomly assigned women with a multiple pregnancy between 12 and 20 weeks' gestation (1: 1) to pessary or control groups, using a web-based application with a computer-generated list with random block sizes of two to four, stratified by hospital. Participants and investigators were aware of group allocation. For women in the pessary group, a midwife or obstetrician inserted a cervical pessary between 16 and 20 weeks' gestation. Women in the control group did not receive the pessary, but otherwise received similar obstetrical care to those in the pessary group. The primary outcome was a composite of poor perinatal outcome: stillbirth, periventricular leucomalacia, severe respiratory distress syndrome, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, intraventricular haemorrhage, necrotising enterocolitis, proven sepsis, and neonatal death. Analyses were by modified intention to treat. This trial is registered in the Dutch trial registry, number NTR1858.Findings Between Sept 21, 2009, and March 9, 2012, 813 women underwent randomisation, of whom 808 were analysed (401 in the pessary group; 407 in the control group). At least one child of 53 women (13%) in the pessary group had poor perinatal outcome, compared with 55 (14%) in the control group (relative risk 0.98, 95% CI 0.69-1.39).Interpretation In unselected women with a multiple pregnancy, prophylactic use of a cervical pessary does not reduce poor perinatal outcome.
KW - PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL
KW - DOUBLE-BLIND
KW - 17-ALPHA-HYDROXYPROGESTERONE CAPROATE
KW - VAGINAL PROGESTERONE
KW - CERCLAGE PESSARY
KW - MUCUS PLUG
KW - RISK
KW - INCOMPETENCE
KW - SINGLETON
KW - OUTCOMES
U2 - 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61408-7
DO - 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61408-7
M3 - Article
SN - 0140-6736
VL - 382
SP - 1341
EP - 1349
JO - LANCET
JF - LANCET
IS - 9901
ER -