CKD: A Call for an Age-Adapted Definition

Pierre Delanaye*, Kitty J. Jager, Arend Bokenkamp, Anders Christensson, Laurence Dubourg, Bjorn Odvar Eriksen, Francois Gaillard, Giovanni Gambaro, Markus van der Giet, Richard J. Glassock, Olafur S. Indridason, Marco van Londen, Christophe Mariat, Toralf Melsom, Olivier Moranne, Gunnar Nordin, Runolfur Palsson, Hans Pottel, Andrew D. Rule, Elke SchaeffnerMaarten W. Taal, Christine White, Anders Grubb, Jan A. J. G. van den Brand

*Bijbehorende auteur voor dit werk

    Onderzoeksoutput: Review articleAcademicpeer review

    50 Citaten (Scopus)


    Current criteria for the diagnosis of CKD in adults include persistent signs of kidney damage, such as increased urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio or a GFR below the threshold of 60 ml/min per 1.73 m(2). This threshold has important caveats because it does not separate kidney disease from kidney aging, and therefore does not hold for all ages. In an extensive review of the literature, we found that GFR declines with healthy aging without any overt signs of compensation (such as elevated single-nephron GFR) or kidney damage. Older living kidney donors, who are carefully selected based on good health, have a lower predonation GFR compared with younger donors. Furthermore, the results from the large meta-analyses conducted by the CKD Prognosis Consortium and from numerous other studies indicate that the GFR threshold above which the risk of mortality is increased is not consistent across all ages. Among younger persons, mortality is increased at GFR

    Originele taal-2English
    Pagina's (van-tot)1785-1805
    Aantal pagina's21
    TijdschriftJournal of the American Society of Nephrology
    Nummer van het tijdschrift10
    StatusPublished - okt-2019

    Citeer dit