Comparison of laparoscopic versus robot-assisted versus transanal total mesorectal excision surgery for rectal cancer: a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study of short-term outcomes

J. C. Hol*, T. A. Burghgraef, M. L. W. Rutgers, R. M. P. H. Crolla, N. A. W. van Geloven, R. Hompes, J. W. A. Leijtens, F. Polat, A. Pronk, A. B. Smits, J. B. Tuynman, E. G. G. Verdaasdonk, E. C. J. Consten, C. Sietses

*Bijbehorende auteur voor dit werk

OnderzoeksoutputAcademicpeer review

2 Citaten (Scopus)
42 Downloads (Pure)


Background: Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery for rectal cancer has important technical limitations. Robot-assisted and transanal TME (TaTME) may overcome these limitations, potentially leading to lower conversion rates and reduced morbidity. However, comparative data between the three approaches are lacking. The aim of this study was to compare short-term outcomes for laparoscopic TME, robot-assisted TME and TaTME in expert centres.

Methods: Patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery between 2015 and 2017 in expert centres for laparoscopic, robot-assisted or TaTME were included. Outcomes for TME surgery performed by the specialized technique in the expert centres were compared after propensity score matching. The primary outcome was conversion rate. Secondary outcomes were morbidity and pathological outcomes.

Results: A total of 1078 patients were included. In rectal cancer surgery in general, the overall rate of primary anastomosis was 39.4, 61.9 and 61.9 per cent in laparoscopic, robot-assisted and TaTME centres respectively (P

Conclusion: In the minimally invasive treatment of rectal cancer more primary anastomoses are created in robotic and TaTME expert centres.

Originele taal-2English
Pagina's (van-tot)1380-1387
Aantal pagina's8
TijdschriftBritish Journal of Surgery
Nummer van het tijdschrift11
Vroegere onlinedatum9-aug-2021
StatusPublished - nov-2021

Citeer dit