TY - JOUR
T1 - Conventional CT for the prediction of an involved circumferential resection margin in primary rectal cancer
AU - Wolberink, Steven V. R. C.
AU - Beets-Tan, Regina G. H.
AU - de Haas-Kock, Danielle F. M.
AU - Span, Mark M.
AU - van de Jagt, Eric J.
AU - van de Velde, Cornelis J. H.
AU - Wiggers, Theo
PY - 2007
Y1 - 2007
N2 - Purpose: To determine the accuracy of conventional computed tomography (CT) scan in the preoperative prediction of an involved circumferential resection margin (CRM) in primary rectal cancer. Methods: 125 patients with biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma of the rectum underwent CT of the abdomen before undergoing total mesorectal excision. Scans were scored by three observers, differing in experience. The main outcome was yes/no involvement of the CRM. Histology was taken as reference standard. Results: For the most experienced observer, observer A, sensitivity was 46.7% and specificity 92.6%. For observer B, sensitivity was 46.7% and specificity 89.5%. For the least experienced observer C, sensitivity was 43.3% and specificity 92.6%. Inter-observer variability was good between observers A and B (kappa 0.648), B and C (kappa 0.648), and intermediate between A and C (kappa 0.542). Discrepancies occurred in a total of 34 patients; 25 had a CT scan of low technical quality, 10 an anteriorly located distal tumor. Conclusion: Conventional CT scan lacks sensitivity for a clinical use in the preoperative assessment of an involved CRM in primary rectal cancer. Modern multislice spiral CT will probably resolve some of the problems of conventional CT; however, further research is needed to establish its role. Copyright (c) 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel
AB - Purpose: To determine the accuracy of conventional computed tomography (CT) scan in the preoperative prediction of an involved circumferential resection margin (CRM) in primary rectal cancer. Methods: 125 patients with biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma of the rectum underwent CT of the abdomen before undergoing total mesorectal excision. Scans were scored by three observers, differing in experience. The main outcome was yes/no involvement of the CRM. Histology was taken as reference standard. Results: For the most experienced observer, observer A, sensitivity was 46.7% and specificity 92.6%. For observer B, sensitivity was 46.7% and specificity 89.5%. For the least experienced observer C, sensitivity was 43.3% and specificity 92.6%. Inter-observer variability was good between observers A and B (kappa 0.648), B and C (kappa 0.648), and intermediate between A and C (kappa 0.542). Discrepancies occurred in a total of 34 patients; 25 had a CT scan of low technical quality, 10 an anteriorly located distal tumor. Conclusion: Conventional CT scan lacks sensitivity for a clinical use in the preoperative assessment of an involved CRM in primary rectal cancer. Modern multislice spiral CT will probably resolve some of the problems of conventional CT; however, further research is needed to establish its role. Copyright (c) 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel
KW - rectum, computed tomography
KW - neoplasms
KW - rectal cancer surgery
KW - circumferential resection margin
KW - TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION
KW - PREOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY
KW - LOCAL RECURRENCE
KW - ADJUVANT RADIOTHERAPY
KW - CARCINOMA
KW - SURGERY
U2 - 10.1159/000099174
DO - 10.1159/000099174
M3 - Article
SN - 0257-2753
VL - 25
SP - 80
EP - 85
JO - Digestive diseases
JF - Digestive diseases
IS - 1
ER -