TY - JOUR
T1 - Corporate governance and sustainability performance
T2 - Analysis of triple bottom line performance
AU - Hussain, Nazim
AU - Rigoni, Ugo
AU - Orij, Réne P.
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - The study empirically investigates the relationship between corporate governance and the triple bottom line sustainability performance through the lens of agency theory and stakeholder theory. We claim, in fact, that no single theory fully accounts for all the hypothesised relationships. We measure sustainability performance through manual content analysis on sustainability reports of the US-based companies. The study extends the existing literature by investigating the impact of selected corporate governance mechanisms on each dimension of sustainability performance, as defined by the GRI framework. Our approach allows to identify which governance mechanisms foster triple bottom line performance, also revealing that some mechanisms fit only specific dimension(s) of sustainability. The fact-based findings provide support for a new beginning in the theorising process in which the theories must try not only to provide rationale for the impact of corporate governance on sustainability, but also to explain which dimension of sustainability might be more affected. The most important implication for practitioners is the support for sustainability practices, which may be gained through implementation of particular corporate governance mechanisms. The findings contribute also to the improvement of the ongoing standard setting process, in particular as it concerns the in-depth revision of the economic dimension of sustainability carried out under the new GRI framework.
AB - The study empirically investigates the relationship between corporate governance and the triple bottom line sustainability performance through the lens of agency theory and stakeholder theory. We claim, in fact, that no single theory fully accounts for all the hypothesised relationships. We measure sustainability performance through manual content analysis on sustainability reports of the US-based companies. The study extends the existing literature by investigating the impact of selected corporate governance mechanisms on each dimension of sustainability performance, as defined by the GRI framework. Our approach allows to identify which governance mechanisms foster triple bottom line performance, also revealing that some mechanisms fit only specific dimension(s) of sustainability. The fact-based findings provide support for a new beginning in the theorising process in which the theories must try not only to provide rationale for the impact of corporate governance on sustainability, but also to explain which dimension of sustainability might be more affected. The most important implication for practitioners is the support for sustainability practices, which may be gained through implementation of particular corporate governance mechanisms. The findings contribute also to the improvement of the ongoing standard setting process, in particular as it concerns the in-depth revision of the economic dimension of sustainability carried out under the new GRI framework.
KW - Corporate Governance
KW - Board independence
KW - Sustainability performance
KW - Agency theory
KW - Stakeholder theory
KW - SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY DISCLOSURE
KW - FIRM FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
KW - VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURE
KW - BOARD COMPOSITION
KW - ENVIRONMENTAL DISCLOSURE
KW - STAKEHOLDER THEORY
KW - LISTED COMPANIES
KW - DIRECTORS
KW - SIZE
KW - DETERMINANTS
U2 - 10.1007/s10551-016-3099-5
DO - 10.1007/s10551-016-3099-5
M3 - Article
SN - 0167-4544
VL - 149
SP - 411
EP - 432
JO - Journal of Business Ethics
JF - Journal of Business Ethics
IS - 2
ER -