Cost-effectiveness models of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines: Variability and impact of modeling assumptions

Raymond A Farkouh*, Rogier M Klok, Maarten J Postma, Craig S Roberts, David R Strutton

*Bijbehorende auteur voor dit werk

OnderzoeksoutputAcademicpeer review

18 Citaten (Scopus)

Samenvatting

Currently, 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV); and ten-valent PCV vaccine are marketed. Neither vaccine obtained regulatory approval based on efficacy trials, but instead were approved based on a surrogate end point: immunogenicity data measuring effective antibody levels. Therefore, direct measures of efficacy were unavailable at the time economic analyses were conducted. The authors systematically reviewed cost-effectiveness studies of ten-valent PCV and 13-valent PCV from the literature to analyze the methodologies and compare the assumptions made about vaccine effectiveness. The following three inputs were found the most variant across analyses: efficacy against acute otitis media; inclusion of indirect effects; and cross protection. These assumptions are discussed with regard to the validity of supporting data and implications on decision-making.

Originele taal-2English
Pagina's (van-tot)1235-1247
Aantal pagina's13
TijdschriftExpert review of vaccines
Volume11
Nummer van het tijdschrift10
DOI's
StatusPublished - okt.-2012

Citeer dit