Criticism and Justification of Negotiated Compromises

Jan Albert van Laar; Erik C. W. Krabbe

Criticism and Justification of Negotiated Compromises

Onderzoeksoutput: Conference contribution › Academic

Samenvatting

The paper focuses on conflicts about an already negotiated compromise, taking as its example a debate in Dutch parliament about the approval of the Paris Agreement on climate change of 2015. It deals with a variety of worries that opponents of approval may advance and the arguments in its defense thus invited. It concludes with a profile of dialogue providing reasonable options for those involved in such a conflict.

Originele taal-2	English
Titel	Argumentation and Inference
Subtitel	Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation
Redacteuren	Steve Oswald, Didier Maillat
Uitgeverij	College Publications
Hoofdstuk	60
Pagina's	887-907
Aantal pagina's	21
Volume	2
ISBN van geprinte versie	978-1-84890-264-8
Status	Published - 2018
Evenement	2nd European Conference on Argumentation - Fribourg, Switzerland Duur: 20-jun.-2017 → 23-jun.-2017 http://ecargument.org/?page_id=730

Publicatie series

Naam	Studies in Logic: Logic and Argumentation
Uitgeverij	College Publications
Volume	77

Conference

Conference	2nd European Conference on Argumentation
Verkorte titel	ECA 2017
Land/Regio	Switzerland
Stad	Fribourg
Periode	20/06/2017 → 23/06/2017
Internet adres	http://ecargument.org/?page_id=730

Handle.net

Permanente koppeling

Citeer dit

@inproceedings{e3cf6f3e731b44b8a92476afaac2514f,

title = "Criticism and Justification of Negotiated Compromises",

abstract = "The paper focuses on conflicts about an already negotiated compromise, taking as its example a debate in Dutch parliament about the approval of the Paris Agreement on climate change of 2015. It deals with a variety of worries that opponents of approval may advance and the arguments in its defense thus invited. It concludes with a profile of dialogue providing reasonable options for those involved in such a conflict. ",

keywords = "argument schemes, compromise, criticisms, Paris Agreement, profile of dialogue, stock issues",

author = "{van Laar}, {Jan Albert} and Krabbe, {Erik C. W.}",

year = "2018",

language = "English",

isbn = "978-1-84890-264-8",

volume = "2",

series = "Studies in Logic: Logic and Argumentation",

publisher = "College Publications",

pages = "887--907",

editor = "Steve Oswald and Didier Maillat",

booktitle = "Argumentation and Inference",

note = "2nd European Conference on Argumentation, ECA 2017 ; Conference date: 20-06-2017 Through 23-06-2017",

url = "http://ecargument.org/?page_id=730",

}

van Laar, JA & Krabbe, ECW 2018, Criticism and Justification of Negotiated Compromises. in S Oswald & D Maillat (uitgave), Argumentation and Inference: Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation. vol. 2, Studies in Logic: Logic and Argumentation, vol. 77, College Publications, blz. 887-907, 2nd European Conference on Argumentation, Fribourg, Switzerland, 20/06/2017.

Criticism and Justification of Negotiated Compromises. / van Laar, Jan Albert ; Krabbe, Erik C. W.
Argumentation and Inference: Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation. uitgave / Steve Oswald; Didier Maillat. Vol. 2 College Publications, 2018. blz. 887-907 (Studies in Logic: Logic and Argumentation; Vol. 77).

Onderzoeksoutput: Conference contribution › Academic

TY - GEN

T1 - Criticism and Justification of Negotiated Compromises

AU - van Laar, Jan Albert

AU - Krabbe, Erik C. W.

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - The paper focuses on conflicts about an already negotiated compromise, taking as its example a debate in Dutch parliament about the approval of the Paris Agreement on climate change of 2015. It deals with a variety of worries that opponents of approval may advance and the arguments in its defense thus invited. It concludes with a profile of dialogue providing reasonable options for those involved in such a conflict.

AB - The paper focuses on conflicts about an already negotiated compromise, taking as its example a debate in Dutch parliament about the approval of the Paris Agreement on climate change of 2015. It deals with a variety of worries that opponents of approval may advance and the arguments in its defense thus invited. It concludes with a profile of dialogue providing reasonable options for those involved in such a conflict.

KW - argument schemes, compromise, criticisms, Paris Agreement, profile of dialogue, stock issues

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 978-1-84890-264-8

VL - 2

T3 - Studies in Logic: Logic and Argumentation

SP - 887

EP - 907

BT - Argumentation and Inference

A2 - Oswald, Steve

A2 - Maillat, Didier

PB - College Publications

T2 - 2nd European Conference on Argumentation

Y2 - 20 June 2017 through 23 June 2017

ER -

Criticism and Justification of Negotiated Compromises

Samenvatting

Publicatie series

Conference

Handle.net

Vingerafdruk

Citeer dit