Criticism and Justification of Negotiated Compromises

OnderzoeksoutputAcademic

Samenvatting

The paper focuses on conflicts about an already negotiated compromise, taking as its example a debate in Dutch parliament about the approval of the Paris Agreement on climate change of 2015. It deals with a variety of worries that opponents of approval may advance and the arguments in its defense thus invited. It concludes with a profile of dialogue providing reasonable options for those involved in such a conflict.

Originele taal-2English
TitelArgumentation and Inference
SubtitelProceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation
RedacteurenSteve Oswald, Didier Maillat
UitgeverijCollege Publications
Hoofdstuk60
Pagina's887-907
Aantal pagina's21
Volume2
ISBN van geprinte versie978-1-84890-264-8
StatusPublished - 2018
Evenement2nd European Conference on Argumentation - Fribourg, Switzerland
Duur: 20-jun-201723-jun-2017
http://ecargument.org/?page_id=730

Publicatie series

NaamStudies in Logic: Logic and Argumentation
UitgeverijCollege Publications
Volume77

Conference

Conference2nd European Conference on Argumentation
Verkorte titelECA 2017
Land/RegioSwitzerland
StadFribourg
Periode20/06/201723/06/2017
Internet adres

Citeer dit