De validiteit van de Western Ontario Stability Index en de Carter Rowe Score - De beste keuze in uitkomstmaten na schouderstabilisatie: Door de arts gemeten of zelfgerapporteerde?

L. M. Bergman, R. L. Diercks, M. Stevens

OnderzoeksoutputAcademicpeer review

Samenvatting

Purpose of this study: to test the validity of the Dutch version of the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) and to compare the physician-based Carter Rowe Score (CRS) with the patient-based WOSI. Methods: 36 consecutive patients with a history of shoulder instability who had undergone arthroscopic transglenoid Bankart repair were evaluated with the CRS and the WOSI. The average follow-up was 63.6 months (SD 25.6). Results: the WOSI showed a moderate correlation with the Carter Rowe Score Ir = 0,441. The Dutch version can be reliably used in the Dutch population. Conclusion: the WOSI is a good primary outcome tool for evaluation of the results of stabilisation procedures of the shoulder, whereas the CRS is an additional, disease-specific analytic tool to find and correct the reasons for the low WOSI score.

Vertaalde titel van de bijdrageThe validity of the Western Ontario Stability Index and the Carter Rowe Score: The best choice in outcome measurements after shoulder stabilization: Measured by physician or self-reported?
Originele taal-2Dutch
Pagina's (van-tot)6-10
Aantal pagina's5
TijdschriftSport en Geneeskunde
Volume41
Nummer van het tijdschrift5
StatusPublished - dec.-2008

Keywords

  • Anterior shoulder instability
  • Carter Rowe Score
  • Outcome measurement
  • WOSI

Vingerafdruk

Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'De validiteit van de Western Ontario Stability Index en de Carter Rowe Score - De beste keuze in uitkomstmaten na schouderstabilisatie: Door de arts gemeten of zelfgerapporteerde?'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

Citeer dit