Detecting careless respondents in web-based questionnaires: Which method to use?

A. Susan M. Niessen*, Rob R. Meijer, Jorge N. Tendeiro

*Corresponding author voor dit werk

Onderzoeksoutput: ArticleAcademicpeer review

145 Citaten (Scopus)
1340 Downloads (Pure)

Samenvatting

High data quality is an important prerequisite for sound empirical research. Meade and Craig (2012) and Huang, Curran, Keeney, Poposki, and DeShon (2012) discussed methods to detect unmotivated or careless respondents in large web-based questionnaires. We first discuss these methods and present multi-test extensions of person-fit statistics as alternatives. Second, we applied these methods to data collected through a web-based questionnaire, in which some respondents received instructions to respond quickly which can result in more careless responding. In addition, we conducted a simulation study. We compared sensitivity and specificity of different methods and concluded that multi-test extensions of person-fit statistics are a good alternative as compared to other methods, although the sensitivity to detect careless respondents using empirical data was lower than using simulated data. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Originele taal-2English
Pagina's (van-tot)1-11
Aantal pagina's11
TijdschriftJournal of Research in Personality
Volume63
DOI's
StatusPublished - aug.-2016

Vingerafdruk

Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'Detecting careless respondents in web-based questionnaires: Which method to use?'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

Citeer dit