TY - JOUR
T1 - Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Model Based on MRI and Clinical Characteristics to Predict Risk of Prostate Cancer Progression
AU - Roest, Christian
AU - Kwee, Thomas C
AU - de Jong, Igle J
AU - Schoots, Ivo G
AU - van Leeuwen, Pim
AU - Heijmink, Stijn W T P J
AU - van der Poel, Henk G
AU - Fransen, Stefan J
AU - Saha, Anindo
AU - Huisman, Henkjan
AU - Yakar, Derya
PY - 2025/1
Y1 - 2025/1
N2 - Purpose: To validate a deep learning (DL) model for predicting the risk of prostate cancer (PCa) progression based on MRI and clinical parameters and compare it with established models.Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 1607 MRI scans of 1143 male patients (median age, 64 years; IQR, 59-68 years) undergoing MRI for suspicion of clinically significant PCa (csPCa) (International Society of Urological Pathology grade > 1) between January 2012 and May 2022 who were negative for csPCa at baseline MRI. A DL model was developed using baseline MRI and clinical parameters (age, prostate-specific antigen [PSA] level, PSA density, and prostate volume) to predict the time to PCa progression (defined as csPCa diagnosis at follow-up). Internal and external testing was performed. The model's ability to predict progression to csPCa was assessed by Cox regression analyses. Predictive performance of the DL model up to 5 years after baseline MRI in comparison with the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) future-risk calculator, Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT) risk calculator, and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) was assessed using the Harrell C-index. Optimized follow-up intervals were derived from Kaplan-Meier curves.Results: DL scores predicted csPCa progression (internal cohort: hazard ratio [HR], 1.97 [95% CI: 1.61, 2.41; P < .001]; external cohort: HR, 1.32 [95% CI: 1.14, 1.55; P < .001]). The model identified a subgroup of patients (approximately 20%) with risks for csPCa of 3% or less, 8% or less, and 18% or less after 1-, 2-, and 4-year follow-up, respectively. DL scores had a C-index of 0.68 (95% CI: 0.63, 0.74) at internal testing and 0.56 (95% CI: 0.51, 0.61) at external testing, outperforming ERSPC and PCPT (both P < .001) at internal testing.Conclusion: The DL model accurately predicted PCa progression and provided improved risk estimations, demonstrating its ability to aid in personalized follow-up for low-risk PCa.
AB - Purpose: To validate a deep learning (DL) model for predicting the risk of prostate cancer (PCa) progression based on MRI and clinical parameters and compare it with established models.Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 1607 MRI scans of 1143 male patients (median age, 64 years; IQR, 59-68 years) undergoing MRI for suspicion of clinically significant PCa (csPCa) (International Society of Urological Pathology grade > 1) between January 2012 and May 2022 who were negative for csPCa at baseline MRI. A DL model was developed using baseline MRI and clinical parameters (age, prostate-specific antigen [PSA] level, PSA density, and prostate volume) to predict the time to PCa progression (defined as csPCa diagnosis at follow-up). Internal and external testing was performed. The model's ability to predict progression to csPCa was assessed by Cox regression analyses. Predictive performance of the DL model up to 5 years after baseline MRI in comparison with the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) future-risk calculator, Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT) risk calculator, and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) was assessed using the Harrell C-index. Optimized follow-up intervals were derived from Kaplan-Meier curves.Results: DL scores predicted csPCa progression (internal cohort: hazard ratio [HR], 1.97 [95% CI: 1.61, 2.41; P < .001]; external cohort: HR, 1.32 [95% CI: 1.14, 1.55; P < .001]). The model identified a subgroup of patients (approximately 20%) with risks for csPCa of 3% or less, 8% or less, and 18% or less after 1-, 2-, and 4-year follow-up, respectively. DL scores had a C-index of 0.68 (95% CI: 0.63, 0.74) at internal testing and 0.56 (95% CI: 0.51, 0.61) at external testing, outperforming ERSPC and PCPT (both P < .001) at internal testing.Conclusion: The DL model accurately predicted PCa progression and provided improved risk estimations, demonstrating its ability to aid in personalized follow-up for low-risk PCa.
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging
KW - Deep Learning
KW - Disease Progression
KW - Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Aged
KW - Retrospective Studies
KW - Risk Assessment
KW - Predictive Value of Tests
KW - Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood
KW - Prostate/diagnostic imaging
U2 - 10.1148/rycan.240078
DO - 10.1148/rycan.240078
M3 - Article
C2 - 39792014
SN - 2638-616X
VL - 7
JO - Radiology: Imaging Cancer
JF - Radiology: Imaging Cancer
IS - 1
M1 - e240078
ER -