TY - JOUR
T1 - Diagnostic performance of co-rads and the rsna classification system in evaluating covid-19 at chest cta meta-analysis
AU - Kwee, Robert M.
AU - Adams, Hugo J.A.
AU - Kwee, Thomas C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© RSNA, 2021.
PY - 2021/2
Y1 - 2021/2
N2 - Purpose: To determine the diagnostic performance of the COVID-19 Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS) and the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) categorizations in patients with clinically suspected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection.Materials and Methods: In this meta-analysis, studies from 2020, up to August 24, 2020, were assessed for inclusion criteria of studies that used CO-RADS or the RSNA categories for scoring chest CT in patients suspected of having COVID-19. A total of 186 studies were identified. After review of abstracts and text, a total of nine studies were included in this study. Patient information (n¸ age, sex), CO-RADS and RSNA scoring categories, and other study characteristics were extracted. Study quality was assessed with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Meta-analysis was performed with a random effects model.Results: Nine studies (3283 patients) were included. Overall study quality was good, except for risk of nonperformance of repeated reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing after negative initial RT-PCR testing and persistent clinical suspicion in four studies. Pooled COVID-19 frequencies in CO-RADS categories were: 1, 8.8%; 2, 11.1%; 3, 24.6%; 4, 61.9%; and 5, 89.6%. Pooled COVID-19 frequencies in RSNA classification categories were: negative, 14.4%; atypical, 5.7%; indeterminate, 44.9%; and typical, 92.5%. Pooled pairs of sensitivity and specificity using CO-RADS thresholds were the following: at least 3, 92.5% (95% CI: 87.1, 95.7) and 69.2% (95%: CI: 60.8, 76.4); at least 4, 85.8% (95% CI: 78.7, 90.9) and 84.6% (95% CI: 79.5, 88.5); and 5, 70.4% (95% CI: 60.2, 78.9) and 93.1% (95% CI: 87.7, 96.2). Pooled pairs of sensitivity and specificity using RSNA classification thresholds for indeterminate were 90.2% (95% CI: 87.5, 92.3) and 75.1% (95% CI: 68.9, 80.4) and for typical were 65.2% (95% CI: 37.0, 85.7) and 94.9% (95% CI: 86.4, 98.2).Conclusion: COVID-19 infection frequency was higher in patients categorized with higher CO-RADS and RSNA classification categories.
AB - Purpose: To determine the diagnostic performance of the COVID-19 Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS) and the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) categorizations in patients with clinically suspected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection.Materials and Methods: In this meta-analysis, studies from 2020, up to August 24, 2020, were assessed for inclusion criteria of studies that used CO-RADS or the RSNA categories for scoring chest CT in patients suspected of having COVID-19. A total of 186 studies were identified. After review of abstracts and text, a total of nine studies were included in this study. Patient information (n¸ age, sex), CO-RADS and RSNA scoring categories, and other study characteristics were extracted. Study quality was assessed with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Meta-analysis was performed with a random effects model.Results: Nine studies (3283 patients) were included. Overall study quality was good, except for risk of nonperformance of repeated reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing after negative initial RT-PCR testing and persistent clinical suspicion in four studies. Pooled COVID-19 frequencies in CO-RADS categories were: 1, 8.8%; 2, 11.1%; 3, 24.6%; 4, 61.9%; and 5, 89.6%. Pooled COVID-19 frequencies in RSNA classification categories were: negative, 14.4%; atypical, 5.7%; indeterminate, 44.9%; and typical, 92.5%. Pooled pairs of sensitivity and specificity using CO-RADS thresholds were the following: at least 3, 92.5% (95% CI: 87.1, 95.7) and 69.2% (95%: CI: 60.8, 76.4); at least 4, 85.8% (95% CI: 78.7, 90.9) and 84.6% (95% CI: 79.5, 88.5); and 5, 70.4% (95% CI: 60.2, 78.9) and 93.1% (95% CI: 87.7, 96.2). Pooled pairs of sensitivity and specificity using RSNA classification thresholds for indeterminate were 90.2% (95% CI: 87.5, 92.3) and 75.1% (95% CI: 68.9, 80.4) and for typical were 65.2% (95% CI: 37.0, 85.7) and 94.9% (95% CI: 86.4, 98.2).Conclusion: COVID-19 infection frequency was higher in patients categorized with higher CO-RADS and RSNA classification categories.
U2 - 10.1148/ryct.2021200510
DO - 10.1148/ryct.2021200510
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85104934408
SN - 2638-6135
VL - 3
JO - Radiology: cardiothoracic imaging
JF - Radiology: cardiothoracic imaging
IS - 1
M1 - e200510
ER -