TY - JOUR
T1 - Digital correction of magnification in pelvic x rays for preoperative planning of hip joint replacements
T2 - Theoretical development and clinical results of a new protocol
AU - The, B
AU - Diercks, R L
AU - Stewart, R E
AU - van Ooijen, P M A
AU - van Horn, J R
PY - 2005/8
Y1 - 2005/8
N2 - The introduction of digital radiological facilities leads to the necessity of digital preoperative planning, which is an essential part of joint, replacement surgery. To avoid errors in the preparation and execution of hip surgery, reliable correction of the Magnification of the projected hip is a prerequisite. So far, no validated method exists to accomplish this. We-present validated geometrical models of the x-ray projection of spheres, relevant for the calibration procedure to correct for the radiographic magnification. With help of these models a new calibration protocol was developed. The validity and precision of this procedure was determined in clinical practice. Magnification factors could be predicted with a maximal margin of error, of 1.5%. The new calibration protocol is valid and reliable. The clinical tests revealed that correction of, magnification has a 95% margin of error of -3% to +3%. Future research might clarify if a strict calibration protocol, as presented in this. study, results in more accurate preoperative planning of hip joint replacements. (c) 2005 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
AB - The introduction of digital radiological facilities leads to the necessity of digital preoperative planning, which is an essential part of joint, replacement surgery. To avoid errors in the preparation and execution of hip surgery, reliable correction of the Magnification of the projected hip is a prerequisite. So far, no validated method exists to accomplish this. We-present validated geometrical models of the x-ray projection of spheres, relevant for the calibration procedure to correct for the radiographic magnification. With help of these models a new calibration protocol was developed. The validity and precision of this procedure was determined in clinical practice. Magnification factors could be predicted with a maximal margin of error, of 1.5%. The new calibration protocol is valid and reliable. The clinical tests revealed that correction of, magnification has a 95% margin of error of -3% to +3%. Future research might clarify if a strict calibration protocol, as presented in this. study, results in more accurate preoperative planning of hip joint replacements. (c) 2005 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
KW - Algorithms
KW - Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods
KW - Calibration
KW - Hip Joint/diagnostic imaging
KW - Humans
KW - Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods
KW - Pelvis/diagnostic imaging
KW - Practice Patterns, Physicians'
KW - Preoperative Care/methods
KW - Prosthesis Fitting/methods
KW - Radiographic Image Enhancement/methods
KW - Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods
KW - Reproducibility of Results
KW - Sensitivity and Specificity
KW - Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods
U2 - 10.1118/1.1984293
DO - 10.1118/1.1984293
M3 - Article
C2 - 16193788
SN - 0094-2405
VL - 32
SP - 2580
EP - 2589
JO - Medical Physics
JF - Medical Physics
IS - 8
ER -