TY - JOUR
T1 - Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with parallel analysis
AU - Timmerman, Marieke E.
AU - Lorenzo-Seva, Urbano
PY - 2011/6
Y1 - 2011/6
N2 - Parallel analysis (PA) is an often-recommended approach for assessment of the dimensionality of a variable set. PA is known in different variants, which may yield different dimensionality indications. In this article, the authors considered the most appropriate PA procedure to assess the number of common factors underlying ordered polytomously scored variables. They proposed minimum rank factor analysis (MRFA) as an extraction method, rather than the currently applied principal component analysis (PCA) and principal axes factoring. A simulation study, based on data with major and minor factors, showed that all procedures consistently point at the number of major common factors. A polychoric-based PA slightly outperformed a Pearson-based PA, but convergence problems may hamper its empirical application. In empirical practice, PA-MRFA with a 95% threshold based on polychoric correlations or, in case of nonconvergence, Pearson correlations with mean thresholds appear to be a good choice for identification of the number of common factors. PA-MRFA is a common-factor-based method and performed best in the simulation experiment. PA based on PCA with a 95% threshold is second best, as this method showed good performances in the empirically relevant conditions of the simulation experiment.
AB - Parallel analysis (PA) is an often-recommended approach for assessment of the dimensionality of a variable set. PA is known in different variants, which may yield different dimensionality indications. In this article, the authors considered the most appropriate PA procedure to assess the number of common factors underlying ordered polytomously scored variables. They proposed minimum rank factor analysis (MRFA) as an extraction method, rather than the currently applied principal component analysis (PCA) and principal axes factoring. A simulation study, based on data with major and minor factors, showed that all procedures consistently point at the number of major common factors. A polychoric-based PA slightly outperformed a Pearson-based PA, but convergence problems may hamper its empirical application. In empirical practice, PA-MRFA with a 95% threshold based on polychoric correlations or, in case of nonconvergence, Pearson correlations with mean thresholds appear to be a good choice for identification of the number of common factors. PA-MRFA is a common-factor-based method and performed best in the simulation experiment. PA based on PCA with a 95% threshold is second best, as this method showed good performances in the empirically relevant conditions of the simulation experiment.
KW - number of common factors
KW - exploratory factor analysis
KW - minimum rank factor analysis
KW - principal component analysis
KW - polychoric correlation
KW - tetrachoric correlation
KW - EXPLORATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS
KW - DATA CORRELATION-MATRICES
KW - 95TH PERCENTILE EIGENVALUES
KW - PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS
KW - LATENT ROOTS
KW - CORRELATION-COEFFICIENT
KW - ANALYSIS CRITERION
KW - ROBUST ESTIMATION
KW - COMMON FACTORS
KW - MONTE-CARLO
U2 - 10.1037/a0023353
DO - 10.1037/a0023353
M3 - Article
SN - 1082-989X
VL - 16
SP - 209
EP - 220
JO - Psychological Methods
JF - Psychological Methods
IS - 2
ER -