Samenvatting
This study compares a problem-solving account of discovery through writing, which attributes discovery to strategic rhetorical planning and assumes discovery is associated with better quality text, to a dual-process account, which attributes discovery to the combined effect of 2 conflicting processes with opposing relationships to text quality. Low and high self-monitors were asked to write under 2 planning conditions. Keystroke-logging was used to assess the relationship of writing processes with discovery and text quality. The results support the dual-process account: Discovery was related to spontaneous sentence production and global revision of text, which had opposing relationships with text quality.
Originele taal-2 | English |
---|---|
Pagina's (van-tot) | 199-223 |
Aantal pagina's | 25 |
Tijdschrift | Cognition and instruction |
Volume | 36 |
Nummer van het tijdschrift | 3 |
Vroegere onlinedatum | 21-mei-2018 |
DOI's | |
Status | Published - 2018 |