Discussion Games for Preferred Semantics of Abstract Dialectical Frameworks

Atefeh Keshavarzi Zafarghandi; Rineke Verbrugge; Bart Verheij

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-29765-7_6

Discussion Games for Preferred Semantics of Abstract Dialectical Frameworks

Atefeh Keshavarzi Zafarghandi, Rineke Verbrugge, Bart Verheij

Onderzoeksoutput: Chapter › Academic › peer review

3 Citaten (Scopus)

15 Downloads (Pure)

Samenvatting

Abstract dialectical frameworks (ADFs) are introduced as a general formalism for modeling and evaluating argumentation. However, the role of discussion in reasoning in ADFs has not been clarified well so far. The current work provides a discussion game as a proof method for preferred semantics of ADFs to cover this gap. We show that an argument is credulously acceptable (deniable) by an ADF under preferred semantics iff there exists a discussion game that can defend the acceptance (denial) of the argument in question.

Originele taal-2	English
Titel	Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
Redacteuren	Gabriele Kern-Isberner, Zoran Ognjanović
Plaats van productie	Cham
Uitgeverij	Springer
Pagina's	62-73
Aantal pagina's	12
ISBN van elektronische versie	978-3-030-29765-7
ISBN van geprinte versie	978-3-030-29764-0
DOI's	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29765-7_6
Status	Published - 2019

Publicatie series

Naam	Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Uitgeverij	Springer
Volume	11726

Toegang tot document

10.1007/978-3-030-29765-7_6

Discussion Games for Preferred Semantics of Abstract Dialectical FrameworksFinal publisher's version, 337 KBLicentie: Taverne

Andere bestanden en links

http://www.mendeley.com/research/discussion-games-preferred-semantics-abstract-dialectical-frameworks

Citeer dit

Keshavarzi Zafarghandi, A., Verbrugge, R., & Verheij, B. (2019). Discussion Games for Preferred Semantics of Abstract Dialectical Frameworks. In G. Kern-Isberner, & Z. Ognjanović (editors), Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (blz. 62-73). (Lecture Notes in Computer Science ; Vol. 11726). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29765-7_6

@inbook{713fc2eb01714a4984cc46efaba88e3b,

title = "Discussion Games for Preferred Semantics of Abstract Dialectical Frameworks",

abstract = "Abstract dialectical frameworks (ADFs) are introduced as a general formalism for modeling and evaluating argumentation. However, the role of discussion in reasoning in ADFs has not been clarified well so far. The current work provides a discussion game as a proof method for preferred semantics of ADFs to cover this gap. We show that an argument is credulously acceptable (deniable) by an ADF under preferred semantics iff there exists a discussion game that can defend the acceptance (denial) of the argument in question.",

author = "{Keshavarzi Zafarghandi}, Atefeh and Rineke Verbrugge and Bart Verheij",

year = "2019",

doi = "10.1007/978-3-030-29765-7_6",

language = "English",

isbn = "978-3-030-29764-0",

series = "Lecture Notes in Computer Science ",

publisher = "Springer",

pages = "62--73",

editor = "Kern-Isberner, {Gabriele } and Ognjanovi{\'c}, {Zoran }",

booktitle = "Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty",

}

Keshavarzi Zafarghandi, A , Verbrugge, R & Verheij, B 2019, Discussion Games for Preferred Semantics of Abstract Dialectical Frameworks. in G Kern-Isberner & Z Ognjanović (redactie), Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. Lecture Notes in Computer Science , vol. 11726, Springer, Cham, blz. 62-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29765-7_6

Discussion Games for Preferred Semantics of Abstract Dialectical Frameworks. / Keshavarzi Zafarghandi, Atefeh ; Verbrugge, Rineke ; Verheij, Bart.

Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. redactie / Gabriele Kern-Isberner; Zoran Ognjanović. Cham : Springer, 2019. blz. 62-73 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science ; Vol. 11726).

Onderzoeksoutput: Chapter › Academic › peer review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Discussion Games for Preferred Semantics of Abstract Dialectical Frameworks

AU - Keshavarzi Zafarghandi, Atefeh

AU - Verbrugge, Rineke

AU - Verheij, Bart

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Abstract dialectical frameworks (ADFs) are introduced as a general formalism for modeling and evaluating argumentation. However, the role of discussion in reasoning in ADFs has not been clarified well so far. The current work provides a discussion game as a proof method for preferred semantics of ADFs to cover this gap. We show that an argument is credulously acceptable (deniable) by an ADF under preferred semantics iff there exists a discussion game that can defend the acceptance (denial) of the argument in question.

AB - Abstract dialectical frameworks (ADFs) are introduced as a general formalism for modeling and evaluating argumentation. However, the role of discussion in reasoning in ADFs has not been clarified well so far. The current work provides a discussion game as a proof method for preferred semantics of ADFs to cover this gap. We show that an argument is credulously acceptable (deniable) by an ADF under preferred semantics iff there exists a discussion game that can defend the acceptance (denial) of the argument in question.

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/discussion-games-preferred-semantics-abstract-dialectical-frameworks

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-29765-7_6

DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-29765-7_6

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-3-030-29764-0

T3 - Lecture Notes in Computer Science

SP - 62

EP - 73

BT - Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty

A2 - Kern-Isberner, Gabriele

A2 - Ognjanović, Zoran

PB - Springer

CY - Cham

ER -