Distilling best practice principles for public participation in impact assessment follow-up

  • Angus Morrison-Saunders*
  • , Jos Arts
  • , Jenny Pope
  • , Alan Bond
  • , Francois Retief
  • *Corresponding author voor dit werk

OnderzoeksoutputAcademicpeer review

13 Citaten (Scopus)
576 Downloads (Pure)

Samenvatting

Building upon principles for public engagement and for impact assessment (IA) follow-up, this paper distils best practice principles specific to public participation in IA follow-up. Literature review, followed by a simple survey distributed to IA follow-up and/or public engagement practitioners, helped identify key principles and related published sources. Twelve principles for public participation in IA follow-up are presented, which relate to (1) mandatory public reporting, (2) ease of access to published material, (3) full transparency, (4) clarity about the IA follow-up process, (5) input to decision-making, (6) continuous access to IA follow-up activities and feedback, (7) independent verification, (8) two-way communication, (9) partnerships, (10) Indigenous inclusion, (11) participatory monitoring, and (12) involvement in adaptive management. They form a ladder of public engagement; the initial principles pertain mainly to information provision, with increasing levels of participation and legitimacy inherent in the latter principles. The principles are intended to provide a foundation for practitioners and community members involved in IA follow-up to enhance practice at all stages of the development life cycle, helping to achieve sustainable development.

Originele taal-2English
Pagina's (van-tot)48-58
Aantal pagina's11
TijdschriftImpact Assessment and Project Appraisal
Volume41
Nummer van het tijdschrift1
Vroegere onlinedatum11-sep.-2022
DOI's
StatusPublished - 2023

Vingerafdruk

Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'Distilling best practice principles for public participation in impact assessment follow-up'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

Citeer dit