TY - JOUR
T1 - Do self-talk phrases affect behavior in ultimatum games?
AU - Frey, Vincenz
AU - De Mulder, Hannah N.M.
AU - ter Bekke, Marlijn
AU - Struiksma, Marijn E.
AU - van Berkum, Jos J.A.
AU - Buskens, Vincent
N1 - Funding Information:
Financial support was provided by NWO (Vici grant #277–89-001 to van Berkum) and by Utrecht University (funding for the Strategic Theme “Institutions for Open Societies”).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2022/6
Y1 - 2022/6
N2 - The current study investigates whether self-talk phrases can influence behavior in Ultimatum Games. In our three self-talk treatments, participants were instructed to tell themselves (i) to keep their own interests in mind, (ii) to also think of the other person, or (iii) to take some time to contemplate their decision. We investigate how such so-called experimenter-determined strategic self-talk phrases affect behavior and emotions in comparison to a control treatment without instructed self-talk. The results demonstrate that other-focused self-talk can nudge proposers towards fair behavior, as offers were higher in this group than in the other conditions. For responders, self-talk tended to increase acceptance rates of unfair offers as compared to the condition without self-talk. This effect is significant for both other-focused and contemplation-inducing self-talk but not for self-focused self-talk. In the self-focused condition, responders were most dissatisfied with unfair offers. These findings suggest that use of self-talk can increase acceptance rates in responders, and that focusing on personal interests can undermine this effect as it negatively impacts the responders’ emotional experience. In sum, our study shows that strategic self-talk interventions can be used to affect behavior in bargaining situations.
AB - The current study investigates whether self-talk phrases can influence behavior in Ultimatum Games. In our three self-talk treatments, participants were instructed to tell themselves (i) to keep their own interests in mind, (ii) to also think of the other person, or (iii) to take some time to contemplate their decision. We investigate how such so-called experimenter-determined strategic self-talk phrases affect behavior and emotions in comparison to a control treatment without instructed self-talk. The results demonstrate that other-focused self-talk can nudge proposers towards fair behavior, as offers were higher in this group than in the other conditions. For responders, self-talk tended to increase acceptance rates of unfair offers as compared to the condition without self-talk. This effect is significant for both other-focused and contemplation-inducing self-talk but not for self-focused self-talk. In the self-focused condition, responders were most dissatisfied with unfair offers. These findings suggest that use of self-talk can increase acceptance rates in responders, and that focusing on personal interests can undermine this effect as it negatively impacts the responders’ emotional experience. In sum, our study shows that strategic self-talk interventions can be used to affect behavior in bargaining situations.
KW - Emotion regulation
KW - Experiment
KW - Fairness
KW - Self-talk
KW - Ultimatum bargaining
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85126511492
U2 - 10.1007/s11299-022-00286-8
DO - 10.1007/s11299-022-00286-8
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85126511492
SN - 1593-7879
VL - 21
SP - 89
EP - 119
JO - Mind and Society
JF - Mind and Society
IS - 1
ER -