Drowning and aquatic injuries dictionary

David Szpilman; Jose Palacios Aguilar; Roberto Barcala-Furelos; Shayne Baker; Cody Dunne; Amy E Peden; Rob Brander; Andreas Claesson; Stathis Avramidis; Justine Leavy; Jamie Linnea Luckhaus; Leonardo A Manino; Olga Marques; Nina Joy Nyitrai; Luis-Miguel Pascual-Gomez; Leonardo Springer; Teresa Jane Stanley; Allart M Venema; Ana Catarina Queiroga

doi:10.1016/j.resplu.2020.100072

Drowning and aquatic injuries dictionary

David Szpilman^*, Jose Palacios Aguilar, Roberto Barcala-Furelos, Shayne Baker, Cody Dunne, Amy E Peden, Rob Brander, Andreas Claesson, Stathis Avramidis, Justine Leavy, Jamie Linnea Luckhaus, Leonardo A Manino, Olga Marques, Nina Joy Nyitrai, Luis-Miguel Pascual-Gomez, Leonardo Springer, Teresa Jane Stanley, Allart M Venema, Ana Catarina Queiroga

^*Corresponding author voor dit werk

Onderzoeksoutput › Academic › peer review

7 Citaten (Scopus)

103 Downloads (Pure)

Samenvatting

Background: Drowning is a significant public health issue with more than 320,000 deaths globally every year. These numbers are greatly underestimated, however, due to factors such as inadequate data collection, inconsistent categorization and failure to report in certain regions and cultures.The objective of this study was to develop a standardised drowning dictionary using a consensus-based approach. Through creation of this resource, improved clarity amongst stakeholders will be achieved and, as a result, so will our understanding of the drowning issue.

Methodology: A list of terms and their definitions were created and sent to 16 drowning experts with a broad range of backgrounds across four continents and six languages. A review was conducted using a modified Delphi process over five rounds. A sixth round was done by an external panel evaluating the terms' content validity.

Results: The drowning dictionary included more than 350 terms. Of these, less than 10% had been previously published in peer review literature. On average, the external expert validity endorsing the dictionary shows a Scale Content Validity Index (S-CVI/Ave) of 0.91, exceeding the scientific recommended value. Ninety one percent of the items present an I-CVI (Level Content Validity Index) value considered acceptable (>0.78). The endorsement was not a universal agreement (S-CVI/UA: 0.44).

Conclusion: The drowning dictionary provides a common language, and the authors envisage that its use will facilitate collaboration and comparison across prevention sectors, education, research, policy and treatment. The dictionary will be open to readers for discussion and further review at www.idra.world.

Originele taal-2	English
Artikelnummer	100072
Aantal pagina's	6
Tijdschrift	Resuscitation plus
Volume	5
DOI's	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2020.100072
Status	Published - mrt.-2021

Toegang tot document

10.1016/j.resplu.2020.100072Licentie: CC BY-NC-ND

Drowning and aquatic injuries dictionaryFinal publisher's version, 938 KBLicentie: CC BY-NC-ND

Handle.net

Permanente koppeling

Citeer dit

Szpilman, D., Palacios Aguilar, J., Barcala-Furelos, R., Baker, S., Dunne, C., Peden, A. E., Brander, R., Claesson, A., Avramidis, S., Leavy, J., Luckhaus, J. L., Manino, L. A., Marques, O., Nyitrai, N. J., Pascual-Gomez, L.-M., Springer, L., Stanley, T. J., Venema, A. M., & Queiroga, A. C. (2021). Drowning and aquatic injuries dictionary. Resuscitation plus, 5, Artikel 100072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2020.100072

@article{3282b27d531949d3b54f06aeff9f4c14,

title = "Drowning and aquatic injuries dictionary",

abstract = "Background: Drowning is a significant public health issue with more than 320,000 deaths globally every year. These numbers are greatly underestimated, however, due to factors such as inadequate data collection, inconsistent categorization and failure to report in certain regions and cultures.The objective of this study was to develop a standardised drowning dictionary using a consensus-based approach. Through creation of this resource, improved clarity amongst stakeholders will be achieved and, as a result, so will our understanding of the drowning issue.Methodology: A list of terms and their definitions were created and sent to 16 drowning experts with a broad range of backgrounds across four continents and six languages. A review was conducted using a modified Delphi process over five rounds. A sixth round was done by an external panel evaluating the terms' content validity.Results: The drowning dictionary included more than 350 terms. Of these, less than 10% had been previously published in peer review literature. On average, the external expert validity endorsing the dictionary shows a Scale Content Validity Index (S-CVI/Ave) of 0.91, exceeding the scientific recommended value. Ninety one percent of the items present an I-CVI (Level Content Validity Index) value considered acceptable (>0.78). The endorsement was not a universal agreement (S-CVI/UA: 0.44).Conclusion: The drowning dictionary provides a common language, and the authors envisage that its use will facilitate collaboration and comparison across prevention sectors, education, research, policy and treatment. The dictionary will be open to readers for discussion and further review at www.idra.world.",

author = "David Szpilman and {Palacios Aguilar}, Jose and Roberto Barcala-Furelos and Shayne Baker and Cody Dunne and Peden, {Amy E} and Rob Brander and Andreas Claesson and Stathis Avramidis and Justine Leavy and Luckhaus, {Jamie Linnea} and Manino, {Leonardo A} and Olga Marques and Nyitrai, {Nina Joy} and Luis-Miguel Pascual-Gomez and Leonardo Springer and Stanley, {Teresa Jane} and Venema, {Allart M} and Queiroga, {Ana Catarina}",

note = "{\textcopyright} 2021 The Author(s).",

year = "2021",

month = mar,

doi = "10.1016/j.resplu.2020.100072",

language = "English",

volume = "5",

journal = "Resuscitation plus",

issn = "2666-5204",

publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Szpilman, D, Palacios Aguilar, J, Barcala-Furelos, R, Baker, S, Dunne, C, Peden, AE, Brander, R, Claesson, A, Avramidis, S, Leavy, J, Luckhaus, JL, Manino, LA, Marques, O, Nyitrai, NJ, Pascual-Gomez, L-M, Springer, L, Stanley, TJ, Venema, AM & Queiroga, AC 2021, 'Drowning and aquatic injuries dictionary', Resuscitation plus, vol. 5, 100072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2020.100072

TY - JOUR

T1 - Drowning and aquatic injuries dictionary

AU - Szpilman, David

AU - Palacios Aguilar, Jose

AU - Barcala-Furelos, Roberto

AU - Baker, Shayne

AU - Dunne, Cody

AU - Peden, Amy E

AU - Brander, Rob

AU - Claesson, Andreas

AU - Avramidis, Stathis

AU - Leavy, Justine

AU - Luckhaus, Jamie Linnea

AU - Manino, Leonardo A

AU - Marques, Olga

AU - Nyitrai, Nina Joy

AU - Pascual-Gomez, Luis-Miguel

AU - Springer, Leonardo

AU - Stanley, Teresa Jane

AU - Venema, Allart M

AU - Queiroga, Ana Catarina

PY - 2021/3

Y1 - 2021/3

N2 - Background: Drowning is a significant public health issue with more than 320,000 deaths globally every year. These numbers are greatly underestimated, however, due to factors such as inadequate data collection, inconsistent categorization and failure to report in certain regions and cultures.The objective of this study was to develop a standardised drowning dictionary using a consensus-based approach. Through creation of this resource, improved clarity amongst stakeholders will be achieved and, as a result, so will our understanding of the drowning issue.Methodology: A list of terms and their definitions were created and sent to 16 drowning experts with a broad range of backgrounds across four continents and six languages. A review was conducted using a modified Delphi process over five rounds. A sixth round was done by an external panel evaluating the terms' content validity.Results: The drowning dictionary included more than 350 terms. Of these, less than 10% had been previously published in peer review literature. On average, the external expert validity endorsing the dictionary shows a Scale Content Validity Index (S-CVI/Ave) of 0.91, exceeding the scientific recommended value. Ninety one percent of the items present an I-CVI (Level Content Validity Index) value considered acceptable (>0.78). The endorsement was not a universal agreement (S-CVI/UA: 0.44).Conclusion: The drowning dictionary provides a common language, and the authors envisage that its use will facilitate collaboration and comparison across prevention sectors, education, research, policy and treatment. The dictionary will be open to readers for discussion and further review at www.idra.world.

AB - Background: Drowning is a significant public health issue with more than 320,000 deaths globally every year. These numbers are greatly underestimated, however, due to factors such as inadequate data collection, inconsistent categorization and failure to report in certain regions and cultures.The objective of this study was to develop a standardised drowning dictionary using a consensus-based approach. Through creation of this resource, improved clarity amongst stakeholders will be achieved and, as a result, so will our understanding of the drowning issue.Methodology: A list of terms and their definitions were created and sent to 16 drowning experts with a broad range of backgrounds across four continents and six languages. A review was conducted using a modified Delphi process over five rounds. A sixth round was done by an external panel evaluating the terms' content validity.Results: The drowning dictionary included more than 350 terms. Of these, less than 10% had been previously published in peer review literature. On average, the external expert validity endorsing the dictionary shows a Scale Content Validity Index (S-CVI/Ave) of 0.91, exceeding the scientific recommended value. Ninety one percent of the items present an I-CVI (Level Content Validity Index) value considered acceptable (>0.78). The endorsement was not a universal agreement (S-CVI/UA: 0.44).Conclusion: The drowning dictionary provides a common language, and the authors envisage that its use will facilitate collaboration and comparison across prevention sectors, education, research, policy and treatment. The dictionary will be open to readers for discussion and further review at www.idra.world.

U2 - 10.1016/j.resplu.2020.100072

DO - 10.1016/j.resplu.2020.100072

M3 - Comment/Letter to the editor

C2 - 34223340

SN - 2666-5204

VL - 5

JO - Resuscitation plus

JF - Resuscitation plus

M1 - 100072

ER -

Drowning and aquatic injuries dictionary

Samenvatting

Toegang tot document

Handle.net

Vingerafdruk

Citeer dit