TY - JOUR
T1 - Dry powder inhalation, part 2
T2 - the present and future
AU - de Boer, Anne Haaije
AU - Hagedoorn, Paul
AU - Grasmeijer, Floris
N1 - Funding Information:
This paper was not funded. The authors thank Dr. Karlheinz Seyfang and Dr. Marco Laackmann from Harro Hoefliger, Germany for their valuable information and interesting discussions about DPI (capsule and cartridge) filling and assembling.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Introduction: The manufacture of modern dry powder inhalers (DPIs), starting with the Spinhaler (Fisons) in 1967, was only possible thanks to a series of technological developments in the 20th century, of which many started first around 1950. Not until then, it became possible to design and develop effective, cheap and mass-produced DPIs. The link between these technological developments and DPI development has never been presented and discussed before in reviews about the past and present of DPI technology. Areas covered: The diversity of currently used DPIs with single dose, multiple-unit dose and multi-dose DPIs is discussed, including the benefits and drawbacks of this diversity for correct use and the efficacy of the therapy. No specific databases or search engines otherwise than PubMed and Google have been used. Expert opinion: Considering the relatively poor efficacy regarding lung deposition of currently used DPIs, the high rates of incorrect inhaler use and inhalation errors and the poor adherence to the therapy with inhalers, much effort must be put in improving these shortcomings for future DPI designs. Delivered fine particle doses must be increased, correct inhaler handling must become more intuitive and simpler to perform, and the use of multiple inhalers must be avoided.
AB - Introduction: The manufacture of modern dry powder inhalers (DPIs), starting with the Spinhaler (Fisons) in 1967, was only possible thanks to a series of technological developments in the 20th century, of which many started first around 1950. Not until then, it became possible to design and develop effective, cheap and mass-produced DPIs. The link between these technological developments and DPI development has never been presented and discussed before in reviews about the past and present of DPI technology. Areas covered: The diversity of currently used DPIs with single dose, multiple-unit dose and multi-dose DPIs is discussed, including the benefits and drawbacks of this diversity for correct use and the efficacy of the therapy. No specific databases or search engines otherwise than PubMed and Google have been used. Expert opinion: Considering the relatively poor efficacy regarding lung deposition of currently used DPIs, the high rates of incorrect inhaler use and inhalation errors and the poor adherence to the therapy with inhalers, much effort must be put in improving these shortcomings for future DPI designs. Delivered fine particle doses must be increased, correct inhaler handling must become more intuitive and simpler to perform, and the use of multiple inhalers must be avoided.
KW - Adherence
KW - capsule DPI
KW - carbon foot print
KW - compliance
KW - dry powder inhaler
KW - lactose
KW - Multi-dose reservoir DPI
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85136499035&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/17425247.2022.2112570
DO - 10.1080/17425247.2022.2112570
M3 - Review article
C2 - 35984322
AN - SCOPUS:85136499035
SN - 1742-5247
VL - 19
SP - 1045
EP - 1059
JO - Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery
JF - Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery
IS - 9
ER -