TY - JOUR
T1 - Early Response in Albuminuria and Long-Term Kidney Protection during Treatment with an Endothelin Receptor Antagonist
T2 - A Prespecified Analysis from the SONAR Trial
AU - SONAR Investigators
AU - Heerspink, Hiddo J L
AU - Xie, Di
AU - Bakris, George
AU - Correa-Rotter, Ricardo
AU - Hou, Fan-Fan
AU - Kitzman, Dalane W
AU - Kohan, Donald
AU - Makino, Hirofumi
AU - McMurray, John J V
AU - Perkovic, Vlado
AU - Rossing, Peter
AU - Parving, Hans-Henrik
AU - de Zeeuw, Dick
N1 - Copyright © 2021 by the American Society of Nephrology.
PY - 2021/11
Y1 - 2021/11
N2 - BACKGROUND: Whether early reduction in albuminuria with atrasentan treatment predicts its long-term kidney-protective effect is unknown.METHODS: To assess the long-term effects on kidney outcomes of atrasentan versus placebo in the SONAR trial, we enrolled patients who had type 2 diabetes and CKD (stage 2-4) and a urinary albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) of 300-5000 mg/g; participants were receiving maximum tolerated renin-angiotensin system inhibition. After 6 weeks exposure to 0.75 mg/day atrasentan (enrichment period), participants were randomized (stratified by UACR response during enrichment, ranging from ≤60% to >0%) to continue atrasentan or transition to placebo. Primary kidney outcome was a composite of sustained serum creatinine doubling or ESKD.RESULTS: UACR response to atrasentan during enrichment persisted throughout the double-blind treatment phase and predicted the primary kidney outcome, whereas UACR levels with placebo remained below pre-enrichment values in the two highest UACR response strata, and exceeded pre-enrichment values in the two lowest strata. As a result, early UACR response to atrasentan during enrichment was also associated with the primary kidney outcome during placebo. Accordingly, the predictive effect of early albuminuria changes during atrasentan was eliminated after placebo correction, leading to a consistent relative risk reduction for the primary kidney outcome with atrasentan compared with placebo, irrespective of the initial UACR response. The difference between atrasentan and placebo in UACR during double-blind treatment was also consistent across UACR response strata.CONCLUSIONS: Our findings do not support UACR response as a causal predictor of atrasentan's treatment effect. However, the variable trajectory in UACR with placebo, aspects of the trial design, day-to-day variability in albuminuria, and potential long-lasting effects of atrasentan may have contributed.
AB - BACKGROUND: Whether early reduction in albuminuria with atrasentan treatment predicts its long-term kidney-protective effect is unknown.METHODS: To assess the long-term effects on kidney outcomes of atrasentan versus placebo in the SONAR trial, we enrolled patients who had type 2 diabetes and CKD (stage 2-4) and a urinary albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) of 300-5000 mg/g; participants were receiving maximum tolerated renin-angiotensin system inhibition. After 6 weeks exposure to 0.75 mg/day atrasentan (enrichment period), participants were randomized (stratified by UACR response during enrichment, ranging from ≤60% to >0%) to continue atrasentan or transition to placebo. Primary kidney outcome was a composite of sustained serum creatinine doubling or ESKD.RESULTS: UACR response to atrasentan during enrichment persisted throughout the double-blind treatment phase and predicted the primary kidney outcome, whereas UACR levels with placebo remained below pre-enrichment values in the two highest UACR response strata, and exceeded pre-enrichment values in the two lowest strata. As a result, early UACR response to atrasentan during enrichment was also associated with the primary kidney outcome during placebo. Accordingly, the predictive effect of early albuminuria changes during atrasentan was eliminated after placebo correction, leading to a consistent relative risk reduction for the primary kidney outcome with atrasentan compared with placebo, irrespective of the initial UACR response. The difference between atrasentan and placebo in UACR during double-blind treatment was also consistent across UACR response strata.CONCLUSIONS: Our findings do not support UACR response as a causal predictor of atrasentan's treatment effect. However, the variable trajectory in UACR with placebo, aspects of the trial design, day-to-day variability in albuminuria, and potential long-lasting effects of atrasentan may have contributed.
KW - Aged
KW - Albuminuria/drug therapy
KW - Atrasentan/therapeutic use
KW - Causality
KW - Creatinine/urine
KW - Diabetic Nephropathies/drug therapy
KW - Double-Blind Method
KW - Drug Therapy, Combination
KW - Endothelin Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/drug therapy
KW - Risk Reduction Behavior
KW - Sodium Potassium Chloride Symporter Inhibitors/therapeutic use
KW - Treatment Outcome
U2 - 10.1681/ASN.2021030391
DO - 10.1681/ASN.2021030391
M3 - Article
C2 - 34551995
SN - 1046-6673
VL - 32
SP - 2900
EP - 2911
JO - Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
JF - Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
IS - 11
ER -