Economic inequality and the long-term future

Andreas Schmidt, Daan Juijn

OnderzoeksoutputAcademic

Samenvatting

Why, if at all, should we object to economic inequality? Some central arguments – the argument from decreasing marginal utility for example – invoke instrumental reasons and object to inequality because of its effects. Such instrumental arguments, however, often concern only the static effects of inequality and neglect its intertemporal consequences. In this article, we address this striking gap and investigate income inequality’s intertemporal consequences, including its potential effects on humanity’s (very) long-term future. Following recent arguments around future generations and so-called longtermism, those effects might arguably matter more than inequality’s short-term consequences. We assess whether we have instrumental reason to reduce economic inequality based on its intertemporal effects in the short, medium and the very long term. We find a good short and medium-term instrumental case for lower economic inequality. We then argue, somewhat speculatively, that we have instrumental reasons for inequality reduction from a longtermist perspective too, because greater inequality could increase existential risk. We thus have instrumental reasons for reducing inequality, regardless of which time-horizon we take. We then argue that from most consequentialist perspectives, this pro tanto reason also gives us all-things-considered reason. And even across most non-consequentialist views in philosophy, this argument gives us either an all-things-considered or at least weighty pro tanto reason against inequality.
Originele taal-2English
UitgeverGlobal Priorities Institute
Pagina's27
StatusPublished - mei-2021

Publicatie series

NaamGlobal Priorities Institute Working Paper Series
UitgeverijGlobal Priorities Institute Oxford
Nr.4

Vingerafdruk

Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'Economic inequality and the long-term future'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

Citeer dit