Effectiveness of a dynamic usage based computer assisted language program

Fathima Mufeeda Irshad; Merel Keijzer; Martijn Wieling; Marjolein  Verspoor

doi:10.1075/dujal.16018.irs

Effectiveness of a dynamic usage based computer assisted language program

Fathima Mufeeda Irshad^*, Merel Keijzer, Martijn Wieling, Marjolein Verspoor

^*Bijbehorende auteur voor dit werk

Onderzoeksoutput › Academic › peer review

1 Citaat (Scopus)

79 Downloads (Pure)

Samenvatting

The current paper explores whether a Dynamic Usage Based (DUB)
approach – which takes authentic meaningful language use with repetition
and scaffolding for comprehension as its basis – can also be implemented in
a CALL environment. The effectiveness of the DUB-CALL program was
tested in a semester-long experiment, comparing it with a teacher-fronted
DUB program (using the same materials as the CALL program) and a traditional CLT program; 228 university undergraduates in Sri Lanka participated. Language gains were assessed in a pre-post design with an objective
General English Proficiency (GEP) test and a writing task. The results show
that the students in the DUB-CALL condition performed significantly better on the GEP test than the students in the two teacher-fronted classes. The
results of the writing tests show that all groups improved significantly, but
here there were no differences among groups.

Originele taal-2	English
Pagina's (van-tot)	137-162
Aantal pagina's	26
Tijdschrift	Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics
Volume	8
Nummer van het tijdschrift	2
Vroegere onlinedatum	11-apr.-2019
DOI's	https://doi.org/10.1075/dujal.16018.irs
Status	Published - dec.-2019

Toegang tot document

10.1075/dujal.16018.irsLicentie: CC BY

Effectiveness of a dynamic usage based computer assisted language programFinal publisher's version, 805 KBLicentie: CC BY

Handle.net

Permanente koppeling

Citeer dit

@article{73bbf2b720b14e55971145caa3fa9a8f,

title = "Effectiveness of a dynamic usage based computer assisted language program",

abstract = "The current paper explores whether a Dynamic Usage Based (DUB)approach – which takes authentic meaningful language use with repetitionand scaffolding for comprehension as its basis – can also be implemented ina CALL environment. The effectiveness of the DUB-CALL program wastested in a semester-long experiment, comparing it with a teacher-frontedDUB program (using the same materials as the CALL program) and a traditional CLT program; 228 university undergraduates in Sri Lanka participated. Language gains were assessed in a pre-post design with an objectiveGeneral English Proficiency (GEP) test and a writing task. The results showthat the students in the DUB-CALL condition performed significantly better on the GEP test than the students in the two teacher-fronted classes. Theresults of the writing tests show that all groups improved significantly, buthere there were no differences among groups.",

author = "Irshad, {Fathima Mufeeda} and Merel Keijzer and Martijn Wieling and Marjolein Verspoor",

year = "2019",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1075/dujal.16018.irs",

language = "English",

volume = "8",

pages = "137--162",

journal = "Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics",

issn = "2211-7253",

publisher = "John Benjamins Publishers",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effectiveness of a dynamic usage based computer assisted language program

AU - Irshad, Fathima Mufeeda

AU - Keijzer, Merel

AU - Wieling, Martijn

AU - Verspoor, Marjolein

PY - 2019/12

Y1 - 2019/12

N2 - The current paper explores whether a Dynamic Usage Based (DUB)approach – which takes authentic meaningful language use with repetitionand scaffolding for comprehension as its basis – can also be implemented ina CALL environment. The effectiveness of the DUB-CALL program wastested in a semester-long experiment, comparing it with a teacher-frontedDUB program (using the same materials as the CALL program) and a traditional CLT program; 228 university undergraduates in Sri Lanka participated. Language gains were assessed in a pre-post design with an objectiveGeneral English Proficiency (GEP) test and a writing task. The results showthat the students in the DUB-CALL condition performed significantly better on the GEP test than the students in the two teacher-fronted classes. Theresults of the writing tests show that all groups improved significantly, buthere there were no differences among groups.

AB - The current paper explores whether a Dynamic Usage Based (DUB)approach – which takes authentic meaningful language use with repetitionand scaffolding for comprehension as its basis – can also be implemented ina CALL environment. The effectiveness of the DUB-CALL program wastested in a semester-long experiment, comparing it with a teacher-frontedDUB program (using the same materials as the CALL program) and a traditional CLT program; 228 university undergraduates in Sri Lanka participated. Language gains were assessed in a pre-post design with an objectiveGeneral English Proficiency (GEP) test and a writing task. The results showthat the students in the DUB-CALL condition performed significantly better on the GEP test than the students in the two teacher-fronted classes. Theresults of the writing tests show that all groups improved significantly, buthere there were no differences among groups.

U2 - 10.1075/dujal.16018.irs

DO - 10.1075/dujal.16018.irs

M3 - Article

SN - 2211-7253

VL - 8

SP - 137

EP - 162

JO - Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics

JF - Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics

IS - 2

ER -