TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of grazing management on biodiversity across trophic levels
T2 - The importance of livestock species and stocking density in salt marshes
AU - van Klink, Roel
AU - Nolte, Stefanie
AU - Mandema, Freek
AU - Lagendijk, D. D. Georgette
AU - WallisDeVries, Michiel F.
AU - Bakker, Jan P.
AU - Esselink, Peter
AU - Smit, Christian
PY - 2016/11/1
Y1 - 2016/11/1
N2 - European coastal salt marshes are important for the conservation of numerous species of specialist plants, invertebrates, breeding and migratory birds. When these marshes are managed for nature conservation purposes, livestock grazing is often used to counter the dominance of the tall grass Elytrigia atherica, and the subsequent decline in plant species richness. However, it remains unclear what is the optimal choice of livestock species and stocking density to benefit biodiversity of various trophic levels.To fill this knowledge gap, we set up a triplicate, full factorial grazing experiment with cattle and horse grazing at low and high stocking densities (0.5 or 1 animal ha(-1)) at the mainland coast of the Dutch Wadden Sea. Here, we present the results after 4 years and integrate these with previously published results from the same experiment to assess effects of livestock grazing on various trophic groups.Stocking density affected almost all measured variables: high stocking densities favoured plant species richness and suppression of E. atherica, whereas low stocking densities favoured abundances of voles, pollinators and flowers. Densities of different functional groups of birds showed no significant response to the regimes, but tended to be somewhat higher under 0.5 horse and 1 cattle ha(-1).Choice of livestock species had fewer and smaller effects than stocking density. Horse grazing was detrimental to vole density, and showed an interactive effect with stocking density for Asteraceae flower abundance. Multidiversity, a synthetic whole-ecosystem biodiversity measure, did not differ among regimes. These results are discussed in the light of other results from the same experiment.Because of these contrasting effects on different trophic groups, we advise concurrent application of different grazing regimes within a spatial mosaic, with the inclusion of long-term abandonment. High density horse grazing, however, is detrimental to biodiversity. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier B.V.
AB - European coastal salt marshes are important for the conservation of numerous species of specialist plants, invertebrates, breeding and migratory birds. When these marshes are managed for nature conservation purposes, livestock grazing is often used to counter the dominance of the tall grass Elytrigia atherica, and the subsequent decline in plant species richness. However, it remains unclear what is the optimal choice of livestock species and stocking density to benefit biodiversity of various trophic levels.To fill this knowledge gap, we set up a triplicate, full factorial grazing experiment with cattle and horse grazing at low and high stocking densities (0.5 or 1 animal ha(-1)) at the mainland coast of the Dutch Wadden Sea. Here, we present the results after 4 years and integrate these with previously published results from the same experiment to assess effects of livestock grazing on various trophic groups.Stocking density affected almost all measured variables: high stocking densities favoured plant species richness and suppression of E. atherica, whereas low stocking densities favoured abundances of voles, pollinators and flowers. Densities of different functional groups of birds showed no significant response to the regimes, but tended to be somewhat higher under 0.5 horse and 1 cattle ha(-1).Choice of livestock species had fewer and smaller effects than stocking density. Horse grazing was detrimental to vole density, and showed an interactive effect with stocking density for Asteraceae flower abundance. Multidiversity, a synthetic whole-ecosystem biodiversity measure, did not differ among regimes. These results are discussed in the light of other results from the same experiment.Because of these contrasting effects on different trophic groups, we advise concurrent application of different grazing regimes within a spatial mosaic, with the inclusion of long-term abandonment. High density horse grazing, however, is detrimental to biodiversity. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier B.V.
KW - Cattle
KW - Horses
KW - Plants
KW - Birds
KW - Butterflies
KW - Flower-visiting insects
KW - Vegetation
KW - Wetland
KW - GRASSLAND PLANT DIVERSITY
KW - WADDEN SEA
KW - CALCAREOUS GRASSLANDS
KW - DISTRIBUTION PATTERNS
KW - ARTHROPOD DIVERSITY
KW - VEGETATION
KW - HERBIVORES
KW - INTENSITY
KW - ABUNDANCE
KW - IMPACT
U2 - 10.1016/j.agee.2016.11.001
DO - 10.1016/j.agee.2016.11.001
M3 - Article
SN - 0167-8809
VL - 235
SP - 329
EP - 339
JO - Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment
JF - Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment
ER -