End-fire versus side-fire: a randomized controlled study of transrectal ultrasound guided biopsies for prostate cancer detection

Margaretha A. van der Slot*, Joost A. P. Leijte, Deric K. E. van der Schoot, Eric H. G. M. Oomens, Stijn Roemeling

*Bijbehorende auteur voor dit werk

    OnderzoeksoutputAcademicpeer review

    1 Citaat (Scopus)
    125 Downloads (Pure)


    Objectives: To compare prostate cancer detection rates between end-fire and side-fire ultrasound guided prostate biopsy techniques. Methods: A prospective randomized controlled trial was performed in patients who underwent prostate biopsy between 2009 and 2014. Patients were randomly assigned to the end-fire or side fire biopsy groups and underwent transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. The overall prostate cancer detection rate was compared between the two probe configurations. Trial was registered at Clinical Trials.gov with identifier: NCT00851292. Results: A total of 730 patients were included and randomized, 371 patients underwent prostate biopsy with side-fire probe and 359 patients with the end-fire probe. Prostate cancer detection rates were 52.4% in the end fire group and 45.6% in the side fire group (p = .066). Conclusions: No significant difference was found in detection rate of prostate cancer between the end-fire and side-fire probe in transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy, neither for detection rate of prostate cancer in the apex.

    Originele taal-2English
    Pagina's (van-tot)101-104
    Aantal pagina's4
    TijdschriftScandinavian Journal of Urology
    Nummer van het tijdschrift2
    StatusPublished - 3-mrt.-2020

    Citeer dit