Epistemic Diversity and Editor Decisions: A Statistical Matthew Effect

Remco Heesen*, Jan-Willem Romeijn

*Bijbehorende auteur voor dit werk

OnderzoeksoutputAcademicpeer review

54 Downloads (Pure)

Samenvatting

This paper offers a new angle on the common idea that the process of science does not support epistemic diversity. Under minimal assumptions on the nature of journal editing, we prove that editorial procedures, even when impartial in themselves, disadvantage less prominent research programs. This purely statistical bias in article selection further skews existing differences in the success rate and hence attractiveness of research programs, and exacerbates the reputation difference between the programs. After a discussion of the modeling assumptions, the paper ends with a number of recommendations that may help promote scientific diversity through editorial decision making.
Originele taal-2English
Pagina's (van-tot)1-20
Aantal pagina's21
TijdschriftPhilosophers' Imprint
Volume19
Nummer van het tijdschrift39
StatusPublished - sep-2019

Citeer dit