Epistemic Ought is a Commensurable Ought

Anthony Robert Booth

OnderzoeksoutputAcademicpeer review

7 Citaten (Scopus)


I argue that the claim that epistemic ought is incommensurable is self‐defeating. My argument, however, depends on the truth of the premise that there can be not only epistemic reasons for belief, but also non‐epistemic (e.g., moral) reasons for belief. So I also provide some support for that claim.

Originele taal-2English
Pagina's (van-tot)529-539
Aantal pagina's11
TijdschriftEuropean Journal of Philosophy
Nummer van het tijdschrift4
StatusPublished - dec-2014

Citeer dit