TY - JOUR
T1 - Establishing psychological safety in online design-thinking education
T2 - a qualitative study
AU - Moffett, Jenny
AU - Little, Ruth
AU - Illing, Jan
AU - de Carvalho Filho, Marco Antonio
AU - Bok, Harold
N1 - Funding Information:
Open Access funding provided by the IReL Consortium. This project was supported by the Irish Medical Council/INHED Research in Medical Education (RIME) Awards, and the RCSI StEP (Student Engagement and Partnership) initiative.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s).
PY - 2024/4
Y1 - 2024/4
N2 - Design thinking, an approach traditionally used to develop or improve products, services, or processes within design and engineering sectors, has emerged as a novel pedagogical approach. As design thinking becomes more widely established within education contexts, it is important to gain deeper insight as to how such learning environments operate. The aim of this study was to explore online design thinking through the lens of psychological safety. We used a qualitative single-case study design to investigate nine students’ experiences across a nine-week design-thinking project. Data were collected via semi-structured interviews and reflective journal entries, and analysed through reflexive thematic analysis. Our findings suggested that psychological safety is a valuable consideration in the design and implementation of online design-thinking learning environments. Facilitators of psychological safety included having collaborative environments, encouraging leadership, and a focus on team formation. Barriers to psychological safety included difficulties connecting, fear of speaking, and cultural considerations. Our findings also highlighted several outcomes of psychologically safe team climates, including creativity, collaboration, and the development of approaches to working with uncertainty.
AB - Design thinking, an approach traditionally used to develop or improve products, services, or processes within design and engineering sectors, has emerged as a novel pedagogical approach. As design thinking becomes more widely established within education contexts, it is important to gain deeper insight as to how such learning environments operate. The aim of this study was to explore online design thinking through the lens of psychological safety. We used a qualitative single-case study design to investigate nine students’ experiences across a nine-week design-thinking project. Data were collected via semi-structured interviews and reflective journal entries, and analysed through reflexive thematic analysis. Our findings suggested that psychological safety is a valuable consideration in the design and implementation of online design-thinking learning environments. Facilitators of psychological safety included having collaborative environments, encouraging leadership, and a focus on team formation. Barriers to psychological safety included difficulties connecting, fear of speaking, and cultural considerations. Our findings also highlighted several outcomes of psychologically safe team climates, including creativity, collaboration, and the development of approaches to working with uncertainty.
KW - Design thinking
KW - Online learning
KW - Online teamwork
KW - Psychological safety
U2 - 10.1007/s10984-023-09474-w
DO - 10.1007/s10984-023-09474-w
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85162229465
SN - 1387-1579
VL - 27
SP - 179
EP - 197
JO - Learning Environments Research
JF - Learning Environments Research
ER -