TY - JOUR
T1 - Examination of skin lesions for cancer
T2 - Which clinical decision aids and tools are available in general practice?
AU - Koelink, Cecile J. L.
AU - Jonkman, Marcel F.
AU - Van der Meer, Klaas
AU - Van der Heide, Wouter K.
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - Background While skin cancer incidence is rising throughout Europe, general practitioners (GP) feel unsure about their ability to diagnose skin malignancies. Objectives To evaluate whether the GP has sufficient validated clinical decision aids and tools for the examination of potentially malignant skin lesions. Methods We conducted a review searching Medline and the Cochrane Library. In addition, reference lists and personal archives were examined. Outcome measures were sensitivity and specificity but also the advantages and disadvantages of different clinical decision aids and tools. Results No clinical decision aids or tools for the examination of non-pigmented lesions are available. Clinical decision aids and tools for the examination of pigmented lesions have mostly been studied in secondary care and, in primary care, randomised clinical trials comparing the additional value of a clinical decision aid or tools to care are scarce. Conclusion Sufficiently validated clinical decision aids and tools for the examination of potentially malignant skin lesions are lacking in general practice. The clinical decision aids and tools available in primary care need to be studied.
AB - Background While skin cancer incidence is rising throughout Europe, general practitioners (GP) feel unsure about their ability to diagnose skin malignancies. Objectives To evaluate whether the GP has sufficient validated clinical decision aids and tools for the examination of potentially malignant skin lesions. Methods We conducted a review searching Medline and the Cochrane Library. In addition, reference lists and personal archives were examined. Outcome measures were sensitivity and specificity but also the advantages and disadvantages of different clinical decision aids and tools. Results No clinical decision aids or tools for the examination of non-pigmented lesions are available. Clinical decision aids and tools for the examination of pigmented lesions have mostly been studied in secondary care and, in primary care, randomised clinical trials comparing the additional value of a clinical decision aid or tools to care are scarce. Conclusion Sufficiently validated clinical decision aids and tools for the examination of potentially malignant skin lesions are lacking in general practice. The clinical decision aids and tools available in primary care need to be studied.
KW - dermoscopy
KW - diagnosis
KW - general practitioners
KW - skin neoplasms
KW - telemedicine
KW - CUTANEOUS MALIGNANT-MELANOMA
KW - RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL
KW - PRIMARY-CARE PHYSICIANS
KW - BASAL-CELL CARCINOMA
KW - FORWARD TELEDERMATOLOGY CONSULTATION
KW - NAKED-EYE EXAMINATION
KW - UGLY-DUCKLING SIGN
KW - PIGMENTED LESIONS
KW - EPILUMINESCENCE MICROSCOPY
KW - DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY
U2 - 10.1684/ejd.2014.2275
DO - 10.1684/ejd.2014.2275
M3 - Review article
VL - 24
SP - 297
EP - 304
JO - European journal of dermatology
JF - European journal of dermatology
SN - 1167-1122
IS - 3
ER -