Exploring Construct and Consequential Validity of Collaborative Learning Assessment in Higher Education

Hajo Meijer*, Jasperina Brouwer, Rink Hoekstra, Jan Willem Strijbos

*Bijbehorende auteur voor dit werk

OnderzoeksoutputAcademicpeer review

17 Downloads (Pure)

Samenvatting

Despite the advance of collaborative learning in higher education, there is a tension between its assessment and the orientation on students’ individual domain-specific abilities (e.g., knowledge and/or skills) of most higher education curricula. We examined the construct and consequential validity of group assessment, individual assessment, and combined assessment of collaborative learning. Findings showed that the construct and consequential validity of these assessment methods can vary widely within and across cohorts. In view of these findings and considering pragmatic and didactic considerations, combined assessment of collaborative learning might be better suited than group assessment and individual assessment of collaborative learning.

Originele taal-2English
Pagina's (van-tot)891-925
Aantal pagina's35
TijdschriftSmall Group Research
Volume53
Nummer van het tijdschrift6
Vroegere onlinedatum8-jul-2022
DOI's
StatusPublished - dec-2022

Citeer dit