TY - JOUR
T1 - Exploring the association of staff characteristics with staff perceptions of quality of life of individuals with intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviours
AU - Bruinsma, Eke
AU - van den Hoofdakker, Barbara J.
AU - Hoekstra, Pieter J.
AU - de Kuijper, Gerda M.
AU - de Bildt, Annelies A.
PY - 2022/9
Y1 - 2022/9
N2 - Background This study aimed to examine the associations between individual staff and staff team characteristics and quality of life of individuals with intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviours. Method With multilevel analyses, we examined educational level, experience, attitudes and behaviours of 240 staff members, in relation to their perception of quality of life of 152 individuals with intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviours they cared for. Results Two individual staff characteristics were related to better quality of life: higher educational and self-reflection levels. Of the team characteristics, higher educational level, higher self-efficacy and more friendly behaviour were associated with better quality of life. Unexpectedly, higher staff-individual ratio was related to lower quality of life. Conclusions Both individual staff and staff team characteristics are associated with quality of life, indicating the need to take staff team characteristics into account when examining quality of life.
AB - Background This study aimed to examine the associations between individual staff and staff team characteristics and quality of life of individuals with intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviours. Method With multilevel analyses, we examined educational level, experience, attitudes and behaviours of 240 staff members, in relation to their perception of quality of life of 152 individuals with intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviours they cared for. Results Two individual staff characteristics were related to better quality of life: higher educational and self-reflection levels. Of the team characteristics, higher educational level, higher self-efficacy and more friendly behaviour were associated with better quality of life. Unexpectedly, higher staff-individual ratio was related to lower quality of life. Conclusions Both individual staff and staff team characteristics are associated with quality of life, indicating the need to take staff team characteristics into account when examining quality of life.
KW - challenging behaviours
KW - intellectual disabilities
KW - quality of life
KW - staff characteristics
KW - team characteristics
KW - SMALL COMMUNITY HOMES
KW - INTERACTIVE BEHAVIOR
KW - SELF-DETERMINATION
KW - HOUSING SERVICES
KW - SUPPORT STAFF
KW - PEOPLE
KW - PREDICTORS
KW - OUTCOMES
KW - CLIENTS
KW - ATTRIBUTIONS
U2 - 10.1111/jar.13017
DO - 10.1111/jar.13017
M3 - Article
SN - 1360-2322
VL - 35
SP - 1231
EP - 1243
JO - Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities
JF - Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities
IS - 5
ER -