Feasibility of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) follow-up as the primary imaging modality after coiling of intracranial aneurysms

Nicolaas A. Bakker, Henriette E. Westerlaan, Jan D. M. Metzemaekers, J. Marc C. van Dijk, Omid S. Eshghi, Jan Jakob A. Mooij, Rob J. M. Groen*

*Bijbehorende auteur voor dit werk

    OnderzoeksoutputAcademicpeer review

    26 Citaten (Scopus)

    Samenvatting

    Purpose: To determine whether MRA could replace conventional DSA and serve as the primary postinterventional imaging modality in patients with coiled intracranial aneurysms.

    Material and Methods: We studied a prospectively enrolled cohort of 190 patients treated endovascularly for a first-ruptured and/or unruptured intracranial aneurysm between January 2004 and December 2008. The imaging protocol included a 1.5T time-of-flight (TOF) MRA and a DSA at 3 months (on the same day) and, depending on comparability, a 1.5T TOF-MRA or DSA 1 year after treatment. All images were evaluated by a multidisciplinary panel.

    Results: In 141/190 patients, both an MRA and DSA were performed after 3-month follow-up. In 2/141 patients (1.4%), (small) neck remnants gave false-negative MRA results. In one patient (0.7%), this led to additional neurosurgical clipping of the aneurysm. In 25/141 patients, future follow-up (> 3 months) consisted of DSA because of various reasons. In 24/25 of these patients, primary MRA images alone would invariably have led to additional DSA imaging.

    Conclusion: The present study shows that 1.5T TOF-MRA is a feasible primary follow-up modality after coiling of intracranial aneurysms. Given our data, we now suggest that, in every patient with a coiled intracranial aneurysm, the first follow-up, 3 months after coiling, should be an MRA study. Only when this MRA is inconclusive (e.g., because of coil artifacts), or in the case of suspicion of recanalization, should DSA be performed additionally.

    Originele taal-2English
    Pagina's (van-tot)226-232
    Aantal pagina's7
    TijdschriftACTA RADIOLOGICA
    Volume51
    Nummer van het tijdschrift2
    DOI's
    StatusPublished - mrt-2010

    Citeer dit