TY - JOUR
T1 - Federal Disputes in the German Reich under the Weimar Constitution
T2 - Lessons in Dispute Settlement for the Kingdom of the Netherlands
AU - Hoogers, Gerhard
AU - Karapetian, Gohar
PY - 2018/11
Y1 - 2018/11
N2 - Although the German Bundesverfassungsgericht has become one of the most famous constitutional courts in the world, there is an older, less ambitious but nonetheless interesting tradition of constitutional review in Germany. In this article an analysis will be undertaken of the functioning and case law of the Staatsgerichtshof fur das deutsche Reich (RStGH), especially its case law on federal disputes, to see whether this half-forgotten court of the Weimar years could be an interesting role model for the Kingdom of the Netherlands, where the discussion on a new constitutional arrangement for the resolution of federal disputes has been paralysed for years.
AB - Although the German Bundesverfassungsgericht has become one of the most famous constitutional courts in the world, there is an older, less ambitious but nonetheless interesting tradition of constitutional review in Germany. In this article an analysis will be undertaken of the functioning and case law of the Staatsgerichtshof fur das deutsche Reich (RStGH), especially its case law on federal disputes, to see whether this half-forgotten court of the Weimar years could be an interesting role model for the Kingdom of the Netherlands, where the discussion on a new constitutional arrangement for the resolution of federal disputes has been paralysed for years.
KW - constitutional review
KW - federal disputes
KW - Weimar Republic
KW - Kingdom of the Netherlands
U2 - 10.1515/icl-2018-0100
DO - 10.1515/icl-2018-0100
M3 - Article
VL - 12
SP - 257
EP - 287
JO - Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law
JF - Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law
SN - 1995-5855
IS - 3
ER -