Homage to Felsenstein 1981, or why are there so few/many species?

Roger K Butlin*, Maria R Servedio, Carole M Smadja, Claudia Bank, Nicholas H Barton, Samuel M Flaxman, Tatiana Giraud, Robin Hopkins, Erica L Larson, Martine E Maan, Joana Meier, Richard Merrill, Mohamed A F Noor, Daniel Ortiz-Barrientos, Anna Qvarnström

*Corresponding author voor dit werk

    OnderzoeksoutputAcademicpeer review

    13 Citaten (Scopus)
    77 Downloads (Pure)

    Samenvatting

    If there are no constraints on the process of speciation, then the number of species might be expected to match the number of available niches and this number might be indefinitely large. One possible constraint is the opportunity for allopatric divergence. In 1981, Felsenstein used a simple and elegant model to ask if there might also be genetic constraints. He showed that progress towards speciation could be described by the build-up of linkage disequilibrium among divergently selected loci and between these loci and those contributing to other forms of reproductive isolation. Therefore, speciation is opposed by recombination, because it tends to break down linkage disequilibria. Felsenstein then introduced a crucial distinction between "two-allele" models, which are subject to this effect, and "one-allele" models, which are free from the recombination constraint. These fundamentally important insights have been the foundation for both empirical and theoretical studies of speciation ever since.

    Originele taal-2English
    Pagina's (van-tot)978-988
    Aantal pagina's11
    TijdschriftEvolution
    Volume75
    Nummer van het tijdschrift5
    Vroegere onlinedatum19-apr.-2021
    DOI's
    StatusPublished - mei-2021

    Vingerafdruk

    Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'Homage to Felsenstein 1981, or why are there so few/many species?'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

    Citeer dit